389
submitted 4 days ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Mike Banks, President Donald Trump’s top Border Patrol official, resigned from the position on Thursday, “effective immediately.”

Banks’ departure from the Border Patrol comes under the cloud of sex tourism allegations against him.

Several current and former border patrol agents told the Washington Examiner last month that Banks “bragged” about having sex with prostitutes in countries that included Colombia and Thailand.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] tal@lemmy.today 99 points 4 days ago

“I don’t know how he became the chief of the Border Patrol with his character,”

In all other regards, the current administration had maintained such a high bar for ethics in selecting high-ranking officials that this instance could scarcely be believed.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 4 days ago

I don't know how he resigned from his position under this administration with his character. A sex scandal is a qualification for office.

[-] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 17 points 4 days ago

A high bar compared to degenerate pedophiles, alcoholics and manchildren - comparatively speaking.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago

I don't know why he is resigning?!

Didn't PEDOnald give Rush Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom?

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 43 points 4 days ago

You make me happy today by reminding me Rush Limbaugh is dead 🤗.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago

He resigned because he's ashamed he paid for it, unlike the other rapists Trump picked.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

No he's ashamed that she was an adult, that's frowned upon in this Administration.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

They all paid.

[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 days ago

I think trump wants him to resign b/c he actually paid for the services.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

What is “sex tourism”? I feel like it is a phrase that sugar coats what he actually did.

[-] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

going to other countries with lower age of consent laws to fuck children.

Notable the two countries mentioned, Thailand's age of consent is 15. Colombia's is 14. One can only speculate about the other countries he solicited sex in.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

These are not kids in school, btw. They’re slaves sold for rape.

Not that republicans have any problems with raping kids. In fact, their golden leader is king of kid rape. So maybe it’s like he said; he just wanted to retire. Maybe do some travel.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

Canada's age is 16, irrelevant because we don't fuck children.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

Canada's consent laws are also more nuanced than just a bottom age:

A 14 or 15 year old can consent to sexual activity as long as the partner is less than five years older and there is no relationship of trust, authority or dependency or any other exploitation of the young person

A 16 or 17 year old cannot consent to sexual activity if:

  • their sexual partner is in position of trust or authority towards them, for example their teacher or coach

  • the young person is dependent on their sexual partner, for example for care or support

  • the relationship between the young person and their sexual partner is exploitative

sauce

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Wow. Leave it to Canada to make common sense sex laws. I've heard way too many stories of lives being ruined (i.e. incarceration and sex registry) because two people with a wide age gap but a genuine love for each other let their hormones get the better of them.

[-] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Some US states are also like this. Often limits on the types of relationships and a low age of consent (16, say, but with a harder limit on how many months there can be between the parties).

There are a lot of people who are against the kind of predation that is lauded amongst the vile and the wealthy.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Thailand’s age of consent is 15. Colombia’s is 14.

That's insane.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's not the issue, though. The age of consent is a scape goat to distract from the actual source of the sex tourism problem. Colombia's laws for example are on par with the Canadian example quoted above. Yes the age of consent is technically 14, but there's a ton of nuance, like access to sexual rights (which was a big issue, like contraceptives and medical care). As well as strict rules regarding no more than 5 years of age gap.

The real problem is that both Thailand and Colombia have armed criminal groups controlling large swaths of territory where they engage in drug and human trafficking. With both, forced and sex labor intentions. Effective modern day slavery, due to a complex web of factors that make establishing the rule of law very hard. They're far from the only ones, tons of countries all over the world suffer from this issue regardless of age of consent.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago

Going places to have sex with the people there. Not necessarily to abuse children, but in this administration it's a fair assumption

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 5 points 4 days ago

If you just want to have sex with hookers, you can do that in America. You leave the country for more...exotic...adventures.

[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Reverse sex trafficking

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Resigns so he can take a higher position in government, I assume?

I mean this kind of trash is drumpfs type to promote

[-] tacoplease@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Throw a stone, hit a sex pest ... The dregs of the swamp fill this adminstration

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago
[-] ElReatonVaquer0@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago
[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

sticky together?

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Eww, gross.

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Are in the Epstein files

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Given who he works for it's more understandable he bragged about it than they fired him over it. Maybe he tried to hire a trans person or read his kids a book with a gay character.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

He'd probably still have his job if he hadn't mentioned Thailand.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago

great way to bring home some epic STD's....

this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
389 points (99.5% liked)

News

37676 readers
1922 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS