this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'll say all day the goal should have stood. This is a clear red card though and I have no idea how neither the ref nor VAR gave it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Look, he didn’t use his arm as a weapon, so what complaint can anyone really have? Lol, I’m joking, but in my head I am imagining Bruno G severing his arm, putting some barbs on it, and proceeding to beat people with it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when is the audio from the Havertz VAR decision leaking?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You mean the tackle that was actually carded and punished? We see borderline red tackles every game. Sometimes its a red, sometimes they aren't, and sometimes they make a mistake. Havertz' one wasn't the only tackle that gameweek that could have been given a red but wasn't. The point is that while I could understand a red being given, a yellow for it is not anywhere near as massive a blunder as not sending off a player for deliberately striking an opponent in the back of the head.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All these retrospective comments are useless, only make us more grieved.

Start by giving post match punishments and make these more harsh than what they would get during the matches. Give Bruno 6 matches ban for this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lol, Bruno should be punished more heavily for a refereeing error than he would be if he got sent off in game.

Havertz 6 games too?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Considering the unbiased panel (rather than Arsenal fans£ decided this was 3-2 and Havert 5-0, and you want a 6 game ban for Bruno I’m sure you’ll also be arguing for a much longer ban for the much clearer red…..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

was it carded during the game?

If not there should be a retrospective red-card/ban for this. I didn't watch the game but the longer footage (which shows him miss a sliding challenge and then go back in for the elbow) is damning....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“It’s not nice”. Yep but how does that fit within the laws of the game….

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Now we know why they don’t like releasing the audio

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"if you are not nice yellow card at most " pgmol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well as he didn't get anything it's clearly between clean tackle and yellow card.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

and the glorious panel of 5 a week later voted this 3-2.

2 people didn't vote this as a red card.

such stupidity that you'd be naive to not consider corruption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They all agreed it was a red, 2 of them didn't think it was a clear and obvious error for the referee to overturn his original decision

Fwiw him and Jorjinho should've been off. But that's the decision the panel actually made.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They all knew it was a red, they wanted it to look like less of a fuck up.

Same reason they pretended the Havertz one should've also been a red.

Damage control for match fixing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And this is after everyone was giving them credit for the process on the one they released. Clearly they just release the one that looked better. It’s all a PR exercise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

VAR and refereeing in general could be easily improved by an automated software that simply asks the referees about the situation they are reviewing.

Literally just a screen that asks: What are you reviewing? Check all that apply.

Foul? Offside? Unsportsmanlike Conduct?

Then based on what they're reviewing, each team member reviews one aspect.

Handball? -> Did the ball hit the arm below the shoulder (or whatever the rule they're using is)? -> Was the arm extended from the body ? -> Was the arm in a natural position? -> Was the arm in movement? -> Blah blah blah you get the point.

At the end of the process it spits out a quick list of potential options and the refs make a decision that has been assisted by the software. And then, because we know what refs are like, it'll ask them if they've checked for obvious errors. "Are you sure you reviewed the right player? Are you sure you want this onside goal to be overturned? Are there any players having their hair pulled by Cristian Romero?" etc.

Oh and train people in this process, so that the VAR team can be composed of individuals who are not mates with Anthony Taylor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

just checked the flair. still crying. i bet they will keep on crying about it till the end of season.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'll tell this story to my grandchildren 😉

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s embarrassing.

No clear protocol.

No professionalism calling each other by their nicknames.

No technical language at all.

Could you imagine a rugby referee describing something as ‘not nice’?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly if they announced they were giving all VAR roles over to bunch of professional rugby referees along with a handbook of the rules of football I would be over the fucking moon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When they call each other by their nicknames it sounds so corny

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For some reason I read this in Angry Rantman's voice lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what's crazy is that it's basically one person deciding on the decision with no argument against him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, what would happen if he'd just said "Oh, he hit him in the head"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just a reminder that Tomiyasu got a yellow card for taking 8 seconds on a throw in and got a yellow for an Ayew dive which led to him being sent off against Crystal Palace

Meanwhile Bruno received one yellow all game for elbowing Jorginho in the back of the head, pushing him in the back off the ball, choked Declan Rice and shoving Fabio Vieira in the face.

Best league. Worst refs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Smacking havertz with the ball at a throw in as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Completely agree with the first two things about Bruno but choked Declan rice and shoving Fabio viera in the face is abit of a reach lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just a reminder that arsenal got a yellow for knee high studs up flying tackle at full speed while Newcastle got triple the punishment for saying the ref was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just a reminder that Havertz launched himself studs up at shin height and 3 Newcastle players, including the 1 that alarmist had his career ended, got yellows for it. Officially, and unbiasedly, a much worse decision.

Then later when multiple Arsenal players surrounded the ref, including 8 of them for the correctly seated goal, no yellows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So, why can't they retrospectively ban him? The evidence is there. Seems odd to be like "ok, that should have been a red.... but his got away with it"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

However long Arsenal fans cry about it - they can’t escape the reality. This was a red but it was the less egregious and later of two such incidents. On balance Arsenal weren’t screwed over by the refs and still lost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is an unsophisticated operation. We should have a mini version of a traffic control center- multiple screens, technologies and angles to quickly decipher. It is easily possible. This is a few guys interpreting things in a rushed fashion. Game has to move on yes, so every angle needs to be ready to go instead of them marking possibilities and points of failure with multiple humans hurredly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Bruno was gagging for a yellow the whole game so he could serve his ban for the Bournemouth game. At this point he must have thought what do I have to do to be booked 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Not used his arm as a weapon".... Jesus fucking christ. Does Chuck Norris have to parachute onto the pitch, sub in for Bruno, only to karate chop Jorginho in the throat for VAR to think its worthy of a red?

Where the fuck was this energy when Casemiro was sent off for slightly forcefully grabbing someones shirt collar? I don't rememeber weaponized arms being part of the equation then.

I loved the introduction of VAR, but it just clearly shows us that these refs are just making up the rules as they go along, and no amount of tech is going to fix that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hitting people from the back in any conext is totally illegal as far as I'm concerned. Especially when the first contact by the aggressor comes from some part of their body above the waist. In my experience I've had guys who were in a full sprint come up behind me while I was jogging in the box looking past the goal to where the ball is, and they throw up a forearm or elbow to decelerate themselves using my spine as a cushon. In these situations you get direct contusions from the initial blow, and sometimes whiplash and cervical injuries because you can't see it coming. I think when any adult does this it is borderline assault, and should not be a part of the game at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was thinking this is meme VAR with actors, than realized its actually real leak. They sound as me and my co-worker commenting on a foul.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sometimes it's best just to let go

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

can't give red card to Newcastle player easily though, otherwise oil money will stop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Scrap the refs and get AI to do it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What an awful headline, written in the typical Daily Mail style. Howard Webb "admitting" something doesn't mean anything; the man has been retired for years and is simply a TV pundit. It was a bad call and bad process, but I see no reason to promote the Daily Mail here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What happened to them retrospectively banning players?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We still talking about this game smh

(Bruno should have a got a red though no doubt about that)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They are very clearly lying in the audio, there's no way that they don't know it should've been a red, they made the conscious decision to not follow the rules of the sport, to the benefit of one team & the detriment of another.

The fact that this had to be leaked & wasn't released on the VAR review show says it all, they were trying to hide it.

And yet the majority will still laugh at the idea of the PGMOL facilitating match fixing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Give him a red card after the fact. That will REALLY piss off their bosses from their second jobs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

lol Arsenal had Xhaka with "bad reputation". He never had that type of match. Never hit the guy in the head or went shoulder in the back. And he was sent off many many times.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting to know what’s the arbitrary level of the supposed “threshold” before a red is given? See blood? Concussion?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Completed the title for you:

Leaked VAR audio appears to reveal the reason Bruno Guimaraes was NOT sent off in Newcastle's controversial win over Arsenal was due to VAR and professional referee Andrew Madley not knowing the rules.

and that is me being generous...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

“Are you happy with this image?”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

First person who speaks sets the narrative and everyone else just agrees. There's no way that everyone in that replay booth believed it not to be red.

load more comments
view more: next ›