submitted 2 years ago by tcgtms@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ssddeae@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

and the glorious panel of 5 a week later voted this 3-2.

2 people didn't vote this as a red card.

such stupidity that you'd be naive to not consider corruption.

[-] PotatoWifi@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

They all agreed it was a red, 2 of them didn't think it was a clear and obvious error for the referee to overturn his original decision

Fwiw him and Jorjinho should've been off. But that's the decision the panel actually made.

[-] DrCocktapus@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

They all knew it was a red, they wanted it to look like less of a fuck up.

Same reason they pretended the Havertz one should've also been a red.

Damage control for match fixing.

[-] GCFCconner11@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

They both should have been reds.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023

1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

157 readers

1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of !football@soccer.forum.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS