you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

and the glorious panel of 5 a week later voted this 3-2.

2 people didn't vote this as a red card.

such stupidity that you'd be naive to not consider corruption.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    They all agreed it was a red, 2 of them didn't think it was a clear and obvious error for the referee to overturn his original decision

    Fwiw him and Jorjinho should've been off. But that's the decision the panel actually made.

  • source
  • parent