top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 117 points 3 months ago

its not about the wellbeing of our society, its about being in control. by force

  • source
  • [–] 92 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    A 32-hour, 4-day work week can be more productive than a traditional 40-hour, 5-day schedule, particularly for roles that require cognitive engagement beyond routine production line tasks.

    There are studies that prove this. It also reduces sick days. Does anyone care? No, let's ignore science because it feels like it's more productive to force productivity.

    People like simple solutions more than listening to science.

    More cops, less crime.

    More work, more productivity.

    More billionaires, better economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago

    Yeah one of the biggest learnings for me over my career is that people are hard-wired for stories. It doesn't matter how good an engineer/scientist you are, how well explained or robust the logic/study is, etc. People only respond to how things make them feel - we are emotional beings with the ability to rationalize, not the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    I was going to mention the same thing. The recent AI craze and productivity studies are another similar thing. Same with return-to-office. Our rulers (the owner class) put power and cruelty over rationality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 82 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This just in: people will resort to any means necessary to eat. More at 10.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Remember kids, if you see someone shoplifting at the supermarket, no you didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    one of the biggest grocery chains in australia just made $2B last FY. They'll be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Loss is calculated in anyhow. Unless they go out of their way there's no way to know what caused it - shoplifting, breakage, employees making themselves feel slightly better about their abysmal working conditions...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Most of the people who work there don't even care if you're shoplifting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Except for that one overzealous middle-manager who will immediately get irate as if you had insulted them personally, as they demand you go back to the register so an underpiad cashier can embarrassingly ring up every item so they know exactly how much you stole, and finish by entering your face into a 3rd party database that will flag you every time you walk in any other store that also utilizes this database.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 70 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    If poors stop doing crime and cops can't arrest the poors then who will give profit prisons free labor??

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The purpose of cops is not to reduce crime.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    As a person whose home was recently burgled: I spoke with 4 different police officers/detectives in the investigation. I agree that what we need is a less desperate society, not more policing.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Let me guess... They're investigating but have no interest in doing actual police work once the case is filed.

    Bad cop, no doughnut.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    The first two responded to the initial call, the second two were from the forensic ID team, checking for prints and seeing if there was anything likely to give a good DNA signal. I don't know what else I could expect from them. I know they worked with the power company to figure out what time my power was cut, and went to my neighbours to see if they had any video from that time.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Source?

    This just confirms my preexisting biases a little too much.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago

    Cops are mainly to suppress anybody who doesn't go along with the will of the powerful.

    They don't exist to reduce harm to the many, they exist to protect the assets of the Owner class, which is why in Law property "crime" is usually more severely punished than anything but murder and why cops are vastly more speedy at investigating and prosecuting "crimes" committed against the Owner class or their Assets than they are when it's the riff-raff that suffers.

    They're minions to a handful of people, not servants of the public.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago

    Homeless people cost tax payers between 30-50 thousand dollars a year. Housing the homeless is likely fiscally conservative.

    This means the incentive structure in our society is wrong. People who lack the creativity to solve novel problems resort to psychopathy to to be productive in the economy. Military industrial complex, private prisons, judge judy.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago*

    Related: it's been long known that giving unemployed people money is good for the economy.

    "I'm a supporting member of society because I work 40h/week, and you aren't" simply isn't true.

    I don't have the scientific paper to support this but I've known it since the 1990s.

    Economists know it too. It doesn't even have anything to do with "socialism".

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    No no no, that's socialism! Which people have learned is bad... Because, empathy is toxic!

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    This is psychologically unsatisfying for too many people. At the core of capitalist propaganda is the idea the the rich and the poor both deserve what they have. In the US, we further buttress this ideal with something called "prosperity gospel".

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago
    [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    Yeah but that doesn't serve the prison industrial slavery complex

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    They know. But it's better for them for crime to be up and police to be fat, so they can run on being hard on crime, and police works for the rich instead of the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    AgE oF sCIence aND prOgREss

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    But does it protect capital?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Ahh but you see, blaming the poor for all the problems is great they can't effectively fight back and if they do, it's super easy to fearmonger about the riots of 'those people'

    Gotta keep em separated...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    Yeah, well, science also says Twitter is an information black hole, and few that need to see this will see it.

    I know it’s microblog memes, but still. It’s surprising to me how much scientist believers post about the state of the world… on Twitter. It’d be like going into a Nazi bar in Berlin to warn about the Holocaust, or to criticize Catholicism in the Vatican, and thinking you’re somehow in an open forum.

    …At least it isn’t a blue checkmart Tweeter, though.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›