101

For the last couple of years, we’ve watched the same predictable cycle play out across the globe: a state (or country) passes a clunky age-verification mandate, and, without fail, Virtual Private Network (VPN) usage surges as residents scramble to maintain their privacy and anonymity. We've seen...

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] blarth 41 points 2 days ago
[-] lemmyng@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago
[-] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

First funny loss joke ever. Nice.

[-] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

No, it's the opposite. It's the USA.

[-] Truancy@lemmy.org 3 points 2 days ago

Ha, where do you think we are? America? Oh, wait... Yeah were cooked.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 5 points 2 days ago

Land Of The Free™️*

*conditions apply.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago

The land of $59.99 a month with ads.

[-] Truancy@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago
[-] jackal@infosec.pub 19 points 2 days ago

Oh look, Gilead is back in the news. What a shithole. Beautiful state but the people are awful.

[-] Sunshine@piefed.ca 4 points 2 days ago

The commanders, angels and aunts 🤢

[-] hash@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

As a Utahn I'd missed this. But reading what applies... how would a company realize I'm in Utah and be forced to age verify me? My guess is this is actually mostly targeted at sports betting. I don't know a lot about how people are using VPNs there but I'd be surprised if they're running them on their phone constantly.

Not saying I'm okay with it, but the headline made me think I was in for issues using my VPN. What seems to really be coming is a liability rats nest for websites that makes no sense.

This effectively pushes risk averse platforms to universally apply age gating to everyone. The technical impossibility is a feature in this case. As it increases the legal risk of selectively age gating. The path of least resistance then becomes universal age gating, as the alternative is increased costs and liability from selective enforcement. Selective compliance may be acceptable depending on the company, if revenue loss is greater than the maintenance cost. But it is a blow for privacy and win for censorship that these questions even need be asked.

[-] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

I run a VPN full time on my phone and I am not even that paranoid or trying to by pass any age gates. I just want that additional layer of obfuscation from advertising cancer.

[-] mlfh@lm.mlfh.org 2 points 1 day ago

I think that's the point, unfortunately - create a legal burden that is technically impossible to comply with, targeting speech that the state has deemed immoral.

[-] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Praise Jesus. #FreedomSurveillance

this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

4442 readers
270 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS