117

Trump says he's willing to 'risk' your rights for his surveillance powers (reason.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As he was running for another term in the White House in 2024, President Donald Trump made it clear that he was not a fan of the government's electronic spying powers contained within the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

"KILL FISA," he wrote in an all-caps message on Truth Social. "IT WAS ILLEGALLY USED AGAINST ME, AND MANY OTHERS."

It's been two years and five days since Trump wrote that, but it might as well have been another lifetime. On Wednesday, Trump again took to Truth Social as Congress was debating a possible extension to Section 702 of FISA, which allows intelligence services to scoop up electronic communications between Americans and individuals overseas.

Now, Trump says he's willing to "risk" the rights of Americans in order to keep those spying powers intact.

"I am willing to risk the giving up of my Rights and Privileges as a Citizen for our Great Military and Country!" he wrote. "We need to stick together when this Bill comes before the House Rules Committee today to keep it CLEAN!"

The context here is the April 20 deadline for reauthorizing Section 702. As Reason's Joe Lancaster detailed a few weeks ago, that deadline provides opportunities for members of Congress to demand changes to how FISA works.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

This quote is insane after this last week…

Attacks Pope, angers Catholics
Jesus photos, angers Evangelicals
”Give up rights for great American military!”, will anger Libertarians (they are single issue here)

It feels like someone is giving him terrible advice, like trying to actively sabotage his base. The Daily Show had a bit about him looking tired and not trying to lie anymore. It sort of feels like that too. Maybe he just really doesn’t care.

Bonkers week on this front.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Trump doesn't stay in power by broad appeal to voters; it's illegal for him to run again to begin with.

Speaking of which, it's absolutely pants-on-head bonkers that everyone isn't treating him like the lame duck he is. Just putting that out there as a reminder.

Anyway... Trump doesn't stay in power based on democratic broad appeal; he stays in power by radicalizing his base enough to do a coup. Again.

[-] TraipsersWill@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety - Benjamin Franklin

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You're asking America to let you take away their rights and privileges, and your argument, as the person that would be holding the power is that you're willing to take the risk to your rights and privileges?

The king's sales pitch for why his peasants should be ok with handing over even more rights and civil liberty, is that he (the king) is willing to take the non-existent risk to his own rights, in exchange for even more authority and power being given to him.

And somehow, the king having even more domestic spying power is for the benefit of the king's military... Who are currently fighting a foreign war that was started by the king despite having no support from the peasants.

Setting the unjust foreign wars aside for just a min, it seems kind of important to ask why a king (and his military) would somehow benefit from increased domestic authority?

It's not like he views the rights and liberties of the American people living under his ~~regime~~ administration as some kind of threat. Or like he considers American citizens to be hostile enemies..., right? 😅

[-] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

He’s already declared his political opponents and the majority of us that don’t share his ideals as terrorists and hostile enemies, signed a EO to that effect September 2025.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 weeks ago

Its much more fun when lives are on the line
Not mine, of course.
But yours?
Oh boy
Not that'll do just fine

[-] BigMacHole 3 points 3 weeks ago

Good! That's JUST What's needed! UNLESS he tries to ELIMINATE my Right to SHOOT up a SCHOOL!

-Constitution Loving Republicans!

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026

117 points (98.3% liked)

politics

29745 readers

2843 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News