all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 152 points 6 months ago (15 children)

This is a comic by beetlemoses.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist's signature is "advertising".

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and other means.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Seems evil enough to me, if they're doing it purpoesly why hasn't a mod or someone told em to knock it off and to start their own instance with their bs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    This community doesn't have any active mods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That sucks. Tho if it did and they enforced the two post limit per day rule, that would also suck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    The difference being that an ad is trying to sway you to buy a product, but a credit or signature on art is "here's who created this thing THAT YOU ARE ALREADY EXPERIENCING".

    I don't know why they can't distinguish between those.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Thanks. That's quite the extreme take, I get not wanting a crappy watermark across the whole comic. But a subtle signature, or small panel with their name should be fine.

    If they erase social links, that's still crappy but more understandable.

    If they really believe the image it self shouldn't have a credit, then they should put the credit in the post description. They could use a spoiler, so it's up the individual if they want to be "advertised" to.

    Artist Creditbeetlemoses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The OP has stated that they won't consistently attribute sources, even in the way you suggest, until the community implements the rule they want enforcing that users strip attribution out: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116

    They don't deserve your benefit of the doubt, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    That's the most deranged take on ads I've ever heard. Sure, fuck the billion dollar companies and their ads. Artists? Dude what the fuck, you're stealing they're work and taking active steps to remove the artist's name. Nobody is gaining anything on this, the artist looses, and OP looses both time and fucking respect. What the hell is wrong with that person.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    OP clearly don't give a fuck about rules as he has busted past the 2 posts a day rule.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    This plonker again.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    You cropped out the artist name. That strange do you try to steal art ?

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 6 months ago