top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 145 points 6 months ago (25 children)

It’s probably better to read the philosophers Uncle Ted was pulling from (and ultimately failed to understand).

Ellul especially.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Might be a matter of taste, but ISAIF is worth a read on the basis of its wild mix of sociological brilliance and unhingedness IMO. That’s not to say I endorse blowing people up in the slightest, but the work stands taller than the sum of its influences.

    E.g. I think he synthesized and added to quite a few different authors in presenting his concept of oversocialization. (Please do correct me if I’m off-base — I love philosophy but it’s not my main wheelhouse).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 124 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    To all the people in the comments being like "Ted had some good points." Judi Bari, Peter Kropotkin, and Murray Bookchin are all people who have written about environmentalism and the problems of technology, industrialization, and such and better than the reactionary psychopath did. Fascists love the unabomber and use him to normalize eco-fascism. Stop fucking saying he had good points cause there are better authors who have made those same points without all the fucking reactionary and eco-fascism tied to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Uhhhhh

    Stop fucking saying he had good points cause there are better authors who have made those same points

    Doesn’t this inherently imply he does in fact have good points if they’re making the same points… you also make a good point that there’s better sources that don’t come with a ton of ideology baggage but what your saying here is yes he does have good points but read someone else saying his points instead

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Yes that is what I am saying. But just because someone made some good points doesn't mean we should keep using them as the defacto idealogue. Imagine if we kept saying "Hitler had some good points" when talking about animal rights or Osama Bin Laden for anti-imperialism. If you want an edgy thing to make a meme like this out of, use the ELF or ALF. Two groups that are controversial but lack the eco-fascism narrative of the unabomber.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [+] 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    For real. It waters down the meaning of the word "fascist," and now when I talk about actual fascism (with a well-informed take because I only use that word when I'm applying it correctly), people don't take me seriously because they think I'm just "labeling everyone you disagree with as a fascist."

    I'm not. I disagree with everyone I label as a fascist, yes. Because I disagree with fascism and I only label fascists fascists. But I'm perfectly capable of disagreeing with someone without labeling them a fascist, if they're not a fascist. I do it all the time!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    there are better authors who have made those same points without all the fucking reactionary and eco-fascism tied to it.

    Seems like a great reason to discuss Ted's viewpoints. We should definitely discuss the ineffectual extremists. Compare and contrast. Weigh and measure. That's what truth-seekers do. Telling people not to read a particular author borders on censorship.

    But asking people to expand their reading list and providing actual recommendations - that is wonderful and commendable. Thank you for that!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 110 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    Has good points... decides the best way to bring those points to the world is planting bombs.

    Adam Lanza had some good points about autism (remember when he called into that radio show?). His subsequent expression of his feelings about the world was less than optimal. There's no need to give the cunt kudos for his insights.

    This is some "say what you like about Hitler, but at least he made the trains run on time!" level of vacuous.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, you're not entirely wrong, but TK killed 3 and injured less than 30. Harry Truman killed vastly more people than TK and he's essentially lauded, as most ex presidents are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Thanos has good points. How he dealt with the problem is the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 86 points 6 months ago (26 children)

    The longer I work in tech, the more I want to move to a farm 50km from neighbours with just me, my partner, a couple dogs, chickens, and cows.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    "The more I work in tech, the more I wish I was independently wealthy."

    I love how people use the word "just" when making statements about the simple life.

    Simple ain't always cheap....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago* (6 children)

    Simple ain't easy either. Fix yer plumbing, fix yer roof, fix yer fence, feed yer chickens (yes, every day!), clean their poop, etc. etc. etc.

    Homesteading is a lot of work, and you can't just go away for a weekend to visit a friend or explore a new city. It needs constant attention, and the more "independent/self-reliant/off-the-grid" you want to be, the more you need to do everything yourself.

    And even then you need to buy supplies and materials. You're not going to grow a year's-worth of food in your backyard vegetable patch, and you're not gonna make your own lumber, pvc, copper wire, etc.

    There's a lot you can do to achieve a greater degree of independence, but ultimately it's still dependencies all the way down.

    Even the Buddha recognized the interconnectedness of everything in the world; he wasn't just some detached stoic with a community of self-sustaining monks. They depended on the generosity of their surrounding communities, and to this day Buddhist monks still do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    A broken clock is right twice a day

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Did you know that Northrup Grumman developed the standard USPS mail truck? They also developed the B2 stealth bomber. Northrup never intended for their truck to also be a stealth bomber, but Ted said "I'm about to do what's called a 'pro gamer' move."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I agree with this guy every time I run into bad UI design.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    Technology is cool

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Ted had some good ideas, it's just how we went about doing what he did I take issue with.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    ITT people who apparently don't understand what a shit post is.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    Unabomer is how the news wrote it.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (31 children)

    Haven't read unobomber's manifesto and probably never will because fuck anyone who seeks attention this way.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I don't approve of his methods, either.

    Then again, I don't approve of the Church's methods, but there's some pretty good stuff buried in the Christian bible, too.

    Reading something doesn't mean you need to agree with the author. It's not like people are financially supporting the Unibomber, or excusing his actions, when they read his manifesto. They're just studying history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›