top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 211 points 5 months ago (9 children)

"Experiencing interruptions? Find out why" - Naah I'm fine dude, just take your time.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 153 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Oh no! The video is black for a few seconds instead of showing several ads for a minute! Whatever am I going to do???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 107 points 5 months ago (22 children)

    Even if they keep the screen black for 30 second to a minute, I'd still gladly wait in silence than be subjected to advertisements.

    If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I'll just leave the platform. I have no loyalty to YouTube and I'll sooner dump the platform and move on to other video sites than deal with enshittification and ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I’ll just leave the platform.

    Yep. Then it will be time to finally start exploring peertube or something...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 71 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago

    The best part is that Youtube ad revenue is low enough that everyone who can is doing their own sponsor segments, so paying for Youtube to remove their ads doesn't remove a lot of the ads. The only way to an ad-free experience is adblock+sponsorblock.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 56 points 5 months ago
    [–] 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (11 children)

    The people saying "just pay for premium" don't seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads. When google purchased it they promised to keep it that way. Then they slowly started with ads. At first they were pretty unobtrusive banners, then a short skippable preroll then multiple preroll then unskippable preroll. The reason I refuse to pay for premium is because Google created this issue and is now selling the solution. I refuse to be a part of that. It has nothing to do with the creators.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The cost of hosting YouTube itself doesn't pay for itself unfortunately. They could get away with it back then because the internet itself wasn't that big. Therefore, we need to KICK THE NORMIES OUT OF OUR INTERNET. WE WERE HERE FIRST, REEEEEE

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 47 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I would pay if it was a quality service and not ran by clowns

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    My favourite unexpected bonus from switching to Linux has been a completely ad free youtube experience. Not entirely sure why this magic is happening but I love it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    Hey people

    Newpipe

    Pipepipe

    If one ever breaks the other can usually still download or stream with no ads or fuckery

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    They're eventually gonna start banning accounts for this and then requiring login to view YouTube.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I doubt they’ll ever actually do it, just threaten it constantly.

    They’d rather have people without accounts, and/or using adblockers keep using the site. If they started actually cracking down, then it would create a significant pool of users who would use some other platform. They’d rather eat the losses of some people not viewing ads then push a significant amount of users to a potential competitor.

    Much like how Microsoft hasn’t cracked down on unlicensed windows installs because it would push a significant amount of people to look for an alternative OS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 15 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    Unlock origin always always always free

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    hmmm? Sorry I was busy enjoying my favorite creators on invidious with sponsorskip. Not sure what you all guys are talking about. Youtube is so good when you remove Youtube from the equation.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You do you. I like my YT Premium. Many of the creators I watch there simply don't publish anywhere else, and I don't have time for ads, especially if I'm watching on my smart TV.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    This used to be the case, but it's a different equation now. Ads used to be one or two per video. Fine, I get there are bills to pay.

    Now it's pure greed and pushing us to a subscription for a service they purposely made shitty so we would think exactly what you are. 4-5 ads, with forced ads interrupting the videos, and auto redirects to more ads after the video fonishes. Unskippable multi-minute ads.

    And if you're thinking "well then just pay for it", tell that to Netflix, Hulu, and all of the streaming services that were "ad-free" until they decided that actually, pay twice as much or watch ads (even though your paying).

    So while I understand you're saying, you're assuming Google will play fair. They won't. They will up the price, they will still force ads, and it will get worse. I'm taking a stand now saying enough is enough. I'm not rewarding them for enshittifying the service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›