738
Faithful (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 month ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Klear@quokk.au 117 points 1 month ago

I believe it's impossible to prove the existence of two gods.

I'm a diagnostic.

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

I don't drink tea.

I'm an atheaist

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

I hate definite articles, I’m an a-the-ist

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

God, my mother is going to cackle at that one

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Nice, tell her we all said hi! She'll know who you mean.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 64 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 47 points 1 month ago

Have you felt the touch of His noodly appendage?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 month ago

I mean you go girl more power to ya but it definitely isn't easier to explain pastafarianism than agnosticism to normies. Noone except programmers and other too online people even know it exists (yes i am also a terminally online freak relax peeps, real recognize real)

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

That's the neat part - you don't have to explain anything. You just assert the truthfulness of your religion and act offended when people point out how ridiculous it is.

[-] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago

Chad moves. Get theology-mogged you faithless heathencell

[-] ooterness@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Just show them the graph. Can't argue with hard data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 35 points 1 month ago

"I'm not religious"

Can't say I've ever had to explain anything more than that.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i prefer "i'm not superstitious", because that's what all religions are

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 8 points 1 month ago

So how will you teach little girls that they're the problem? How will you fondle little boys? How will you comitt a genocide to prove that your religion is more moral?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

May your water always be salted

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

It's not at all difficult to explain. "I don't believe in gods." Simple as that.

[-] bottleofchips@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 month ago
[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You either believe in god(s) or you don't. Orthogonally you might be sure of your beliefs or not.

Most self-described agnostics are agnostic atheists.

[-] Kurroth@aussie.zone 15 points 1 month ago

Jesus thank god, only one accurate comment in this thread on the difference between atheists and agnostics.

They are the answers to two different questions

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 10 points 1 month ago

I've always thought of agnosticism as being "I don't believe in Gods," and atheism as being "Gods don't exist." It's like the difference between saying "I don't think that plan will work" vs "That plan won't work." One leaves room for you to be wrong, while the other doesn't.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Agnostics are "I don't know, probably not. It's impossible to know.".

Atheists are "I don't think there's a god, there's no proof".

Anti-theists are "there is definitely no god", and they have just as much evidence as believers.

[-] bottleofchips@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Because I just discovered it on wikipedia I think is worth adding ‘Ignostic’ - the belief that frankly it’s pointless even discussing any of this unless you can first define a deity. Seems bloody sensible to me.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Even easier to explain than Pastafarianism though.

[-] org@lemmy.org 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah but you’d be surprised how people would hate you more for believing in nothing than believing in a bowl of pasta… even if it’s a fake believe in pasta that symbolizes nothing.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Hate is hater's problem, not mine

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

You can just call yourself an atheist. Hell, if you call yourself a pastafarian you are basically an anti-theist.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Atheist and agnostic are not synonyms.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[-] Quazatron@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I used to be a pastafarian, now I'm a dudeist.

[-] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

If this is you, consider joining or supporting The Satanic Temple. This is why they exist, and they do more meaningful and practical good than a meme religion.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

One of the core tenants of Pastafarianism is being too lazy or broke (or both) to actually contribute

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Why agnostic? Like... If there's no proof, why believe in the existence of a deity at all?

[-] froh42@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was an agnostic for a very long time.

My main view of things - I couldn't know if there was a god or if there wasn't. But all that ultimate judgement shit never made any sense for me. If you're just behaving decently because of fear of ultimate judgment, then you're not a decent person. Ok if god would want me not to be an asshole, I'd need to be that out of my free will. And if a god demanded adherence to some random rules out of the blue - that god wouldn't have a moral compass and I wouldn't want to have to do anything with them in my life, being smitten down at the end would have been a consequence for me anyways.

I just want to be no asshole. So the question of there's a god or not. I don't care. God is irrelevant.

Thus: agnostic

I started staying I'm an atheist somw time ago, as that's just quicker and I can go by without explaining.

Still - if there's a god around, which is possible but improbable - I'm making sure I make fucking good use of the free will they gave me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

For me personally, atheism is saying 'there is nothing more to the universe or reality, what you see is what you get' which is extremely pretentious. Agnosticism is admitting to the possibility that there's something going on here, but we don't know and would likely be incapable of understanding what it is.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Atheism: I don't believe in the existence of god(s)

Agnosticism: I haven't seen any proof for god thus can't believe in one

It's the same thing really, but without the "negative" connotations usually attributed to atheism or atheists. "See, I'm not really an atheist but agnostic. It means I'm not to be expelled from this community as a heretic"

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Honestly, “it’s easier than explaining” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here 😅

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Good time to point out there is a huge difference between being agnostic and agnostcism. One is a literal state of being, not specific to religion. The other is an ideology toward "deities" based around being agnostic in the topic.

It's just how -ic and -ism be. Most people that say they are agnostic do not follow agnosticism, even if they may share some of its very widely ranged ideas and concepts.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Richard Dawkins referred to himself as a nontheist as a better term then atheist in one of his books. He said there is no such thing as an agnostic, either you believe or you don't believe. If undeniable proof of the existence of a god comes along and you refuse to believe then you are just a fool.

[-] Axiochus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Eh, the converse isn't true. I can be on the fence on whether deities exist. That's different from being convinced that they don't.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

I tell them I'm a SubGenius and give them a pamphlet about our great guru J. R. "Bob" Dobbs!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
738 points (93.3% liked)

Comic Strips

23453 readers
3689 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS