Shame it needs to be law. It used to be common sense that having armed masked lawless thugs roaming the streets was A Bad Thing.

So what happens when they do it anyway and receive federal protection for doing so? Because that's my guess regarding how this restriction is going to go. These fucks already break laws - they probably aren't going to be super likely to follow the law that makes them easier to identify after they break other ones.

And they BETTER be Ready for some VERY VERY VERY Stern Letters when they DONT listen to the Judges Rulings!

They have to clarify this applies to all law enforcement, because a similar California law got struck down because Gov. Gavin Newsom's Office insisted on exempting State Patrol.

More of this dems!

More make it illegal to turn off their body cameras. Oh and enforce it all. Make 3rd offences mandatory termination with an attached ban on law enforcement jobs for 2 years.

While I'm at it is like a billion dollars and a unicorn.

This is a nice symbolic gesture.

However, they will keep wearing masks in spite of it, because they're FEDS and they look upon the State government with contempt, one step away from how they look at "civilians".

funny how states are still afraid of doing anything above banning masks, should be banning from public property

Was wondering why the CA law didn't actually happen...

"Wiener said he and colleagues had crafted the No Secret Police Act in consultation with constitutional law experts, but had "removed state police from the bill" based on conversations with Newsom's office."

Fuck Newsome.

The irony. The “I can’t breathe while I’m working crowd” refuses to wear masks when ordered to, then refuses to unmask, and then have to be ordered to unmask.

They have a problem with orders.

how is the supremacy clause settled?

regardless, I didn't vote for the legislators who created ice, nor the judges who settled any of the relevant case law. abolish all those laws