59

The United States is allowing Iranian oil tankers to transit the Strait of Hormuz, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Monday.

Tanker traffic through the strait has plunged as Iran attacks commercial ships in the Persian Gulf. But the Islamic Republic has continued to export millions of barrels of oil through the narrow sea route despite the large U.S. Navy presence in the region. Iran exports about 1.5 million barrels per day.

The strait, which connects the gulf to the global market, is the most important trade route for oil in the world. About 20% of global oil supplies passed through the narrow waterway before the war.

Oil prices have surged about 40% since the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran two weeks ago. The war has triggered the largest oil supply disruption in history as exports through the strait have collapsed, according to the International Energy Agency. Global oil supplies are expected to plunge by 8 million barrels per day this month, according to the IEA.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Not a defense but an explanation

  1. The oil on those tankers belongs to someone. The US would have to steal Indian, Chinese, or someone else’s oil if they seized those tankers. This would cause even more chaos.

  2. The price of the little remaining unsold oil outside of the Persian Gulf (the spot price for oil) would skyrocket.

[-] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago

You can't break up with me, I break up with you first!!!!!

There are no adults in the room. They're playing tictactoe with WWIII

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

So we attack Iran and then allow only THEM to export oil in the region? I mean WTF? And then the administration acts like this is part of the plan. AND... they think people are OK with this? I'm just...I can't even think right now.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago

Presumably the US would allow any other tankers to pass. They don't want to block other countries. The remarkable thing is that they're allowing Iranian tankers to pass, and the reason is that blocking them is basically an act of was against China.

[-] scibra122@piefed.social 4 points 18 hours ago

Also the straits being useful for Iran is what is keeping them from mining it or at least keeping them from mining it in a substantial manner to make it impassible

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Irony, it'll fuck you every time.

[-] metermatic26@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Does anyone seriously believe a word coming out of the White House anymore?

[-] Akh@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

What an odd article since Iran controls the strait. It is like saying, Peru is allowing Iranian ships through.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 22 hours ago

America can’t allow other ships through, but they could absolutely stop Iranian ships from passing.

[-] Insekticus@aussie.zone 13 points 23 hours ago

Mainstream media is trying their best to not piss off Kegsbreath and make it look like the U.S. hasn't completely fumbled their ~~distraction from the Epstein files~~ war in Iran.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
59 points (94.0% liked)

politics

28921 readers
2004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS