110
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Secure by design… what a joke.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

Security audit by independent third parties, including access to the full source code, or GTFO.

[-] fierysparrow89@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Source code of what? Unfortunately, none of the above is anywhere near enough.

We need locally available ai models that can run off-line. Also: the ai context and history must be kept separately from the model itself.

If the ai model needs to communicate with the outside world, user needs 100% transparency and control what data the ai sends.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Source code of what?

The AI agent. Also, a way to see all of its training data.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago

Microsoft’s push to make Copilot a kind of AI medical middleman—especially through the newly announced Copilot Health—raises a real tension: the company is loudly promoting a Secure by Design philosophy, but the sensitivity of health data means the bar is far higher than a general security promise. The short version is that Secure by Design is necessary, but nowhere near sufficient for something that sits between you, your clinicians, your medical records, and your wearables.

  • Microslop copilot
[-] docus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Security by design is only one aspect of what would be required. Even if it keeps my data secure, if it is going to recommend putting pva glue on cuts and butter on burns, it’s a no from me. Altough i would be curious what it has to say about vaccinations…

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Self-certified Secure By Design isn't worth squat.

[-] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago

Microsoft's AI wants to be your medical middleman, but is a "Secure by Design" promise really enough for Copilot? Would you trust Microsoft with the "puzzle" of your medical records?

Short answer? No, and no.

[-] Griffus@lemmy.zip 11 points 20 hours ago
[-] melfie@lemy.lol 4 points 19 hours ago
[-] Flaqueman@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago

When a headline is a question, the answer is always NO. Case and point

[-] lmr0x61@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Betteridge’s law my beloved

(It isn’t statistically true in practice, though 😔)

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 16 hours ago

I don't trust Microsoft with my temp folder, what makes you think I'm going to trust it with my medical data? In case there's any ambiguity left in that: no, I do not, and will never, trust Microsoft with this data, nor with any other personal, personal adjacent, identifiable, personal, or private data. Period. Hard stop.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Literally adjacent in my feed:

Generative AI agents will never be secure; it's a flaw inherent to their nature.

[-] Griffus@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago

You probably won't see this, but I think you've gotten a response or two in your backlog.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

I regretted not cropping that as soon as I posted it because I knew someone would comment on it, but I couldn't figure out how to crop after-the-fact on my phone and re-upload. The screenshot utility can do it, but the image viewer can't.

[-] Griffus@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago

Sorry for being the one you saw coming, but I am now very fascinated that you can follow up on new ones.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

It's mainly that I just don't bother marking things read, so that's like two and a half years of replies.

[-] DisgruntledPelican@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Microslop wants a lot of things… but they prove that they can’t deliver in term of quality and data safety.

[-] devolution@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Copilot is the worst of them all. I wouldn't trust it to do a grocery list let alone anything medical.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago
[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

duck.com would like a word with you 👍

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago
[-] melfie@lemy.lol 3 points 19 hours ago

Catherine Tate’s guest appearance was always the funniest one:

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Piss off, Micro$lop

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

thing is in a place with no universal healthcare there is a lot to lose. may be bad for places where healthcare is a right but at least its not going to completely prevent you from getting treatment.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
110 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

82581 readers
3540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS