top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 154 points 7 months ago (28 children)

You can fucking have him... If he's got any blood left in him and it's not all just McDonald's brand cholesterol™, you're welcome to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Unfortunately, they will absolutely take the blood of kids from low income families who got duped by sociopathic high school recruiters in his stead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (14 children)

    Just sayin, were already gonna have to rebuild part of the White House...

    I wouldn't see any need to rebuild mar lago tho

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    what if we rebuilt maralago as a skate park and public restroom. so people could ollie and shit on his grave

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 65 points 7 months ago (50 children)

    Conflicted on who I’m supporting here.

  • source
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    The safety of civilians in the region. You don't have to pick a side. We can simultaneously acknowledge that the Iranian and the US regimes are fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (35 replies)
    [–] 55 points 7 months ago

    Hey Iran!

    Don't forget about the rest of his family and all the sycophants that prop him up.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    UPDATE: (no trade for us, I guess)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    We double dog dare you.

    Killing the US president out of retaliation for an illegal war would make us ... unhappy ... or something. Maybe ... I dunno.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 37 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    This sinking seems like a really big deal to me, but I don't feel like it's been treated that way. Everyone seems to react like it's just another example of Trump being shitty, and it is, but also, we sank another country's warship with a torpedo. That seems pretty momentous no matter what country it was.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    And it was unarmed, coming back from an exercise that was essentially a parade. Bonus points of shit!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    This is only the second warship sunk by a nuke sub (HMS Conqueror) and the first warship the US has sunk with a sub since 1945. We won't talk about the Russian cargo ship that "exploded" in 2024.

    In the frame of war, this is big. In the frame of history this is huge. The lack of coverage and the apathy to it is ridiculous. This has never happened in our lifetime, well unless you are 80, so we have that going for us...at least its new lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    It's the first fully unarmed warship sunk though, so that makes it unique. Also extra unique is that the nation and crew were basically invited first to the parade in part by the USA. So basically it's one for the history books in that is a modern red wedding.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Different from smashing their airfields with missiles? Or, is it different because of where it happened?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It feels different in a few ways to me. One, it feels much more personal and "fuck you in particular." It's one thing to lob missiles at a base and fuck whoever happens to be there, but you KNOW there's a real possibility that you kill every mother effer on that ship if you hit it with a torpedo.

    I'm not articulating it very well, but it's just got a different sort of cruelty that something like shelling an airbase just lacks for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I guess I can sort-of see where you're coming from. Presumably when they're bombing an airbase they're trying to hit planes, destroy runways, etc. If you're in the break room at the time there's a decent chance you don't die. If you're working on a plane, you're probably dead. But, when you sink a ship, everyone goes into the water and there's a good chance they'll die.

    To me, the fact that it happened nowhere near Iran is the bigger deal. It means that parts of the world that aren't aligned with either side in the war now have to wonder what might explode in their own territory.

    OTOH, at least when you sink a military ship there won't be civilian casualties. If the US had actually declared war on Iran, which of course never happened, but if... then another warship is actually a valid target. This isn't like blowing up an apartment building because a guy on your kill list is in one of the apartments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    We will absolutely not regret sinking it if you do that. How many warships will it take to do the whole line of succession?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 7 months ago

    They can have him, and all of his appointees, and the billionaires as well. We won't miss them.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago
    [–] 27 points 7 months ago

    Be my guest.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago

    Ironically, so does his medical team. Based on the bruising, wouldn't surprise me if they're having to draw blood constantly for all the testing required to keep his corpse functional.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago

    We cannot forget that the administration is actively trying to architect a tragedy against Americans. It is high treason.

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/03/politics/patel-fbi-national-security-division-firings-iran

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago

    Join the club guys.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago

    Don’t threaten me with a good time.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago
    [–] 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    Oh no please stop don’t

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Oh no. Anything but that. Don't do anything to our beloved Trump...

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago
    [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    I hope they take it on the republican government personally. No point in fighting with an over-funded military lead by a christo-fascist, when you can take it out on retirement age old white folk who had the power to stop the war and decided to lick a pedophiles boots instead.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    You know where he lives.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    I too am calling for Trump's blood. So it for me guys.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    If they restrict themselves to killing Dogey Americans, I would be alright with Iran infiltrating ICE and conducting operations against the Dogey. I don't consider any member of the Dogey to be of my people anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    How much Trump blood they want? We can probably get like 30 L easy, if they accept in laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I would never have thought the day of me agreeing on anything with those cleric lunatics will come, but here it is. We all want to see trumps blood.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›