438
submitted 1 week ago by NomNom@feddit.uk to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 168 points 1 week ago

Vegas forgot the entire reason it was popular in the first place:

Because it was CHEAP. You could go to Vegas and get a nice hotel and go out every night for less than you could go anywhere else because they made their money on gaming instead of the accommodations.

During Covid they pivoted to trying to be a "destination" by ripping off everyone at every corner. The rooms are loaded down with fees, the food and drinks are ridiculously expensive.

The reason to go to Vegas was that a regular middle class person could FEEL like a rich person. That doesn't work when you are priced out of everything.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

Two major things that are hurting Vegas today

International visitors are down due to the orange moron.

Attendance at conventions and corporate meetings are down due to the above stupid decisions. It was a cheap place to hold a large meeting: flights, transit, hotels, meeting hall rental and food were all 30%+ less than anywhere else.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, my company could offer me a fully covered trip with extra free time to explore or have fun in the US and my answer would still be no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago

To expand on Vegas' woes, online gambling has exploded. Why bother driving several hours or take a plane to a desert city to play in several casinos when you can bet on a game or a bunch of outcomes by just using your phone?

[-] rushmonke@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 week ago

That's a great point to bring up.

I wonder why Vegas companies didn't push back against the legalization of online gambling like we saw alcohol and tobacco companies do with marijuana. Perhaps most of them already have their hand in that pie, which is why it's okay. Same thing with how tobacco companies stopped fighting legalization of weed once they became the dominant players.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That was driven by Vegas companies, I remember seeing Bally's and MGM logos on a bunch of online gambling sites/apps when it was first getting started. I don't think they realized just how viral the internet is, and how fast another entity can spin up and eat their lunch.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 103 points 1 week ago

They hike the prices through the roof and drop quality and it’s the consumers’ fault for not wanting to pay extra for crap

[-] zwerg@feddit.org 79 points 1 week ago

Also, who would visit the U.S. right now?

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

They also changed the games to where it was even harder to win and the payout was less.

[-] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

But business analysts said that bleeding their customers dry through predatory tactics was the most important thing to do!

[-] joekar1990@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Think of the shareholders!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also they turned the whole comp system from something that was a fun treat into what amounts to a grocery store rewards points scheme that isn't fun for anyone. So now instead of a pretty girl coming up to you and just handing you a free drink or some guy giving you a free breakfast because you are a big shot, you instead have what amounts to a subway sandwich punch card.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

There was a youtube video a few months back where a person who lived there and had several pro vegas videos outlined how the casinos had done it to themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

And winners are quickly banned. Why would anyone gamble and NOT card count?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

I've only been once, but watching degenerate gamblers and young parents pushing strollers around a big mall drunk was just depressing. I got a vibe of Dollarama Epstein Island.

You know what 1000x better than The Venetian? Venice.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] etherphon@piefed.world 70 points 1 week ago
  1. it's a tacky nightmare
  2. anyone can just gamble on "martket prediction" apps now, I still have no idea how or why those are legal
[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago
[-] etherphon@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago

I'd have no problems if it was just idiots, but there have been people betting on these platforms on things like military movements, inside betting by members of government about things, it's a security nightmare and will end up being just another wealth transfer machine.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mereo@piefed.ca 62 points 1 week ago

Canadians boycotting travel to the U.S. doesn't help, either.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

Yep. “Leisure spending waning” is a roundabout way of saying people are boycotting travel to the United States, and people that live here can barely afford anything anymore either.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

As a Nevada resident you can see this all over the state. The state voted Trump and it’s now gonna pay the price for it. I do feel bad for employees in the housekeeping and food service department. But I do know most of them also voted for trump including a friend of mine who drives taxi in Vegas and complains about everything being expensive. So in that case fuck them, but to the few good ones in the silver state, you have my respect.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nevada voted Trump. They gambled and lost. Time to learn the hard way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

It's okay, the Dow is over 50k.

[-] Inucune@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

They want to cater to the 1%, they're only going to get traffic from the 1%

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

The problem is they are competing with the entire world then. The 1% would rather go to Macau.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly. The top 10% of the US population is currently responsible for 50% of spending, which is propping up the economy. But places like Vegas don't cater to the top 10%. Oh sure, there are high-roller areas; but for the most part, Vegas caters to the lower-middle class. Shockingly, rich people don't like hanging around smokey casinos and a bunch of drunk gambling addicts. It's no surprise that it's suffering.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Hmm yes. That's the only thing contributing to its visitor drop. Nothing else

[-] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Looks at costs of a flight to Amsterdam. Looks at costs to domestic US.

Gee I wonder why.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago

Everyone is holding onto what little cash they have due to great uncertainty. Doesn't matter which party or which country you belong to. I think history will show us that trump was not a good money man at all. Nothing more than an evil little shit stumbling upward because of dad's money. From that point on it was all grifting schemes and tween dreams.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People aren't even drinking anymore.

How scary does shit have to be for a population to look at the cheap alcohol on shelves everywhere and say "Nah, I better save and stay healthy."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It’s always been obvious he’s shitty with money

[-] jownz@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

You can milk a cow many times, but you can only slaughter it once.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

As someone that loves gambling and always wanted to go to Vegas, I'd rather just go somewhere local if I wanna go to a casino. Vegas is as expensive as any other destination vacation (if not more expensive) but that's not why most people want to go there no matter how much they try to change their image. If you're not someone that likes gambling it's probably cheaper and more worthwhile to go to Disney Land. And if you're someone that likes gambling it's cheaper to go to literally any other casino in the country.

[-] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

I lived in Vegas for 5 years and absolutely loved it, but I almost never went anywhere near the strip unless friends or family were visiting. I spent a lot of time out at Red Rock Canyon hiking the trails.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly this. The attraction to Vegas used to be that it was cheap and you could go there and feel like a big shot. Without that there just isn't any reason to go. Its just a little town the middle of the desert, but now it costs more than Hawaii.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

It's called recession. Soon to be the Second Great Depression.

[-] rushmonke@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 week ago
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Honestly, fuck yeah. I feel bad for the countless residents who depend on tourism, but gambling is a scourge upon the Earth and needs to die already, that money doesn't help anyone but casino owners who are, once again, giant corporate whales who soak up money and never return it to the system.

Vegas may be dying but something has to kill the online sites also.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

And the fact that most of the support staff are scared to death of ice throwing them in a concentration camp.

[-] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Leisure spending in fascist regimes is certainly waning. Leisure spending overall continues unabated from where I'm sitting....

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago

They got what they voted for.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Caesars and MGM don't care about your US$5k vacation to Vegas anymore. They just want to deal with the Epstein class that are going to play US$100k hands at their card tables.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

That's how it feels.

Work trip was to Vegas a few months ago. It was pretty dead on a Friday afternoon. It was me and my coworkers walking around trying to find something to do. They were charging $8 for water at the bar. And my nachos was $22.

A decade ago, there would at LEAST be two dozen dealers hanging out at empty tables, inviting people. You'd bump into people or try to navigate a crowd. You'd get coupons for food, and courtesy deals for being a member. Not anymore.

It was a casino with a mall, food court and club scene too! My town's mall had more activity than this. Hell, the McDonald's on the highway had more activity than this.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

So, it's getting worse. There were videos last summer of how empty the Las Vegas Strip was.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

No no, everything is fine. Las Vegas was too crowded before anyway. And last Christmas, people were spending as much if not more than previous years despite what you may have heard. Our economy is absolutely booming. Just look at the stock market, it's the clearest indicator that everyone is doing very well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s not solely local leisure spending. It’s tourism. Who wants to come to the United States now?

I’ve also been told there’s been a switch up in the way the machines work such that it’s just not fun any more.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That's fine, I'm sure billionaires will pick up the tab when all regular people clear out of the Strip.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Might qualify as a leopards eating face moment considering a narrow majority of Clark county voted for Trump :o

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
438 points (99.3% liked)

News

36233 readers
2751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS