top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

Yes, I see.....

Edit: Did your mom tell you it's peak performance?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago

    Get on my level, heretics.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That ship is in shape!

    (Round is a shape.)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Close, but it was actually the Wasp class that was ideal.

    Spaceships are not boats! The engine is not at the back, the engine is at the bottom!

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    This is peak ship form:

    Also the one on the far left fits up your bum easier.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    No flared base though, might get stuck up there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    Shape is irrelevant. Space is a vacuum. You will be assimilated.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    USS Orbiprise

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (18 children)

    I thought peak performance looked like a police box…

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    Not aerodynamic enough for space travel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (16 children)

    Does warp speed require an aerodynamic hull?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I think the Pasteur is a beautiful ship.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
    [–] 7 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    This has me thinking: if ships like this are only ever in the void of space (so never needing to land on a planet or interact with any aspect of it), would there be any point to designing an aerodynamic ship like this vs a huge cube?

    Like sure having a more streamlined ship could make navigating asteroid belts or whatever easier vs a huge box, but like, does it matter for the force required to make it accelerate and decelerate?

    (I just woke up so this might be an obvious answer)

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    There are the considerations with exterior aesthetics, but it's also about being able to maximize interior space and meet design criteria. A change in doctrine after Wolf 359 was to leave as small of a target profile/silhouette as possible, so ships started becoming more streamlined. This also lead to ships being able to travel faster because that lead to creating a more efficient warp bubble around the ships.

    Out of universe, Roddenberry said the nacelles need to see each other, operated in pairs, and the bussard collectors (glowy red parts in front) need to have unobstructed view so they could collect materials from space.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I am not sure about how this phenomenon works in context of the warp drive where space-time itself is warped around the ship, but in universes with more conventional FTL mechanics where objects are contradictory to special relativity just accelerated to speeds beyond the speed of light, yes, aerodynamics do actually kinda come into play again.

    Space isn't really a vacuum, it just is empty enough ao that we can mostly treat it like one. But space still contains a lot of particles, dust or debris for example, that with higher speeds, there is something very similar to an air reaistance, drag and all that.

    However, there may be other factors that can be more important for a space craft design. If you are into absolutely overthinkinh such things, I can recommend Isaac Arthur on Youtube.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Peak performance does not include a deflector dish?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Peak form is a Borg Cube. No wasted space.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›