▲ 216 ▼ The ideal ship form (thelemmy.club) submitted 6 months ago by negativenull@piefed.world [M] to c/tenforward@lemmy.world 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments For AeronMelon@lemmy.world
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 10 points 6 months ago (1 child) I thought peak performance looked like a police box… permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starik@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) Not aerodynamic enough for space travel permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 10 points 6 months ago (4 children) Does warp speed require an aerodynamic hull? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space. Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) They just use more power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent [–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Probably not. There have been a few times where someone has been outside the hull but inside the warp field and they didn't get blown off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) That would be a weird place to receive oral sex. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Captain Jack Harkness has entered the chat. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Not an aerodynamic hull, per se. Just a hull that allowed for an efficient warp bubble to be created and maintained. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago Plus little sheet metal feet that flip down, like a lawn chair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starik@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) Not aerodynamic enough for space travel permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 10 points 6 months ago (4 children) Does warp speed require an aerodynamic hull? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space. Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) They just use more power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent [–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Probably not. There have been a few times where someone has been outside the hull but inside the warp field and they didn't get blown off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) That would be a weird place to receive oral sex. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Captain Jack Harkness has entered the chat. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Not an aerodynamic hull, per se. Just a hull that allowed for an efficient warp bubble to be created and maintained. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago Plus little sheet metal feet that flip down, like a lawn chair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 10 points 6 months ago (4 children) Does warp speed require an aerodynamic hull? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space. Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) They just use more power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent [–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Probably not. There have been a few times where someone has been outside the hull but inside the warp field and they didn't get blown off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) That would be a weird place to receive oral sex. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Captain Jack Harkness has entered the chat. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Not an aerodynamic hull, per se. Just a hull that allowed for an efficient warp bubble to be created and maintained. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago Plus little sheet metal feet that flip down, like a lawn chair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space. Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) They just use more power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space. Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) They just use more power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children) The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There's no need for aerodynamics in space. Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Ah yes, the USS Entropy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago What is that? The space city from Valerian, maybe? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) They just use more power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children) According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Subspacodynamic? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] negativenull@piefed.world [S] 5 points 6 months ago Bubbledynamic? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 child) Probably not. There have been a few times where someone has been outside the hull but inside the warp field and they didn't get blown off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) That would be a weird place to receive oral sex. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Captain Jack Harkness has entered the chat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) That would be a weird place to receive oral sex. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Captain Jack Harkness has entered the chat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago Captain Jack Harkness has entered the chat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago Not an aerodynamic hull, per se. Just a hull that allowed for an efficient warp bubble to be created and maintained. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago Plus little sheet metal feet that flip down, like a lawn chair permalink fedilink source parent