Ring’s controversial, AI-powered “Search Party” feature isn’t intended to always be limited only to dogs, the company’s founder, Jamie Siminoff, told Ring employees in an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

In October, Ring launched Search Party, an on-by-default feature that links together Ring cameras in a neighborhood and uses AI to search for specific lost dogs, essentially creating a networked, automated surveillance system. The feature got some attention at the time, but faced extreme backlash after Ring and Siminoff promoted Search Party during a Super Bowl ad. 404 Media obtained an email that Siminoff sent to all Ring employees in early October, soon after the feature’s launch, which said the feature was introduced “first for finding dogs,” but that it or features like it would be expanded to “zero out crime in neighborhoods.”

“This is by far the most innovation that we have launched in the history of Ring. And it is not only the quantity, but quality,” Siminoff wrote. “I believe that the foundation we created with Search Party, first for finding dogs, will end up becoming one of the most important pieces of tech and innovation to truly unlock the impact of our mission. You can now see a future where we are able to zero out crime in neighborhoods. So many things to do to get there but for the first time ever we have the chance to fully complete what we started.”

Archive: http://archive.today/xKxOd

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 196 points 6 months ago (1 child)

No way! It seemed so authentic when they said they’d search for dogs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 132 points 6 months ago

    I’m shocked! Shocked, I tell you.

    Ok… I’m not shocked at all.

  • source
  • [–] 123 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Imagine spending millions on an ad to alert people to your evil scheme.

    Proof that you don’t have to be smart to be rich and powerful.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It shows you how insular these people must be. That ad was the result of meeting after meeting, plan after plan. They had convinced themselves that the public would eat it up. We would be like "Holy shit that's amazing, let's give you ALL our data and video and privacy!". They actually thought we would go for it. lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    To be fair, I'm actually pleasantly surprised that people didn't go for it.

    It's not like majority of people seemed to give a shit about privacy not too long ago...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    My 12 year old was sold on the idea. But she's 12 and may love dogs more than people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    They are megalomaniacs, the owners and ceo's that were chosen by those owners' and their board members. They surround themselves with yes men, anyone telling them they are wrong will be removed from their lives, as they fashion themselves after the president and other leaders above them that do the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 65 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    No kidding? Next thing you will be telling us that chatcontrol and age checks on the internet will be used for more than just protecting kids from pedophiles and be extended to crushing dissent and opposition and democracy itself, and building social scores on us with all information including these cameras that will be used secretly against us in a way we cannot know or challenge to determine our jobs, background checks, police scrutiny, how courts and government treats you, how business treats you, the prices you are offered online and in digital price tag stores (coming soon,) and even what search results you are shown. All calculated by the antichrist's company, for said pedophile or pedophile adjacent politicians deciding which of us are undesirable, and given a way to slip names of people into the bad score list themselves, always a selling perk under the table to leaders.

    It's always just a trojan horse to get in the walls. It will never end with finding pets, with stopping child abuse, what have you. They find the instance that no one can disagree with then accuse people of helping child abusers, maybe you are a child abuser yourself! It's not subtle. All done by people that are mostly on the epstein's redacted and unreleased pages for actually fucking children.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    You know.. here's the thing..

    Years ago, I'd be on Reddit and reading the usual rants and raves about the government, and how the public should be wary of it and we are heading into a security state.. and I always positied that the real threat actors WRT privacy and security were going to be companies like facebook and google and the businesses that made internet-connected devices.

    Compared to them, as far as data colleciton and surveillance of people - the government was filled with rank amateurs.

    I'd consistently get downvoted or pooh-poohed for being "naive."

    God fucking dammit.. on this.. I am absolutely pissed off that I was calling this one - and have been - for over a decade.

    FML, I hate this SOOOOOO much.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 45 points 6 months ago

    I have to say, it's nice that they got called out on this immediately for a change.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The whole "find lost dogs" thing was likely the result of a single meeting with the agenda item "how do we sell this thing we are already doing as anything other than mass surveillance for state actors?" They probably ended it early.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    And in other breaking news: the sky is blue, tree pretty, and fire hot.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 32 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Why anyone would have non-locally hosted video surveillance in and around their home is beyond me.

    You're basically begging corporations/governments to spy on you.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago
    [–] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Between Ring and Jeffrey Epstein, it's surprising how explicit criminals are about their criminal intentions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 6 months ago
    [–] 26 points 6 months ago

    They lied?!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago
    [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago

    Ancient book of Arabic numerals reveals 2 comes after 1.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago
    [–] 16 points 6 months ago

    What if your kid runs off? Your elderly mother wondered off? A break in was reported down the road? What if all non whites are labeled terrorist? We need to watch you 24/7. Obey

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago

    Yeah, we all saw that coming and it's exactly why everyone's freaking out about it.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago

    Lol fucking duh

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    It's about dogs and crime. Sure.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    Off the record, Siminoff could be heard saying "Dogs today, blacks tomorrow and people later."^[Citation needed]

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    c/noshitsherlock

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    Breaking news: Fire is hot.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    FYI -

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    Ok guys, hear me out.

    I need you to buy these cameras and put them on your face.

    We will record your video for you and keep it safe for you and never give your data to anybody and we'll do all of this for free.

    We'll also give you all of the software and setup all of the servers for you. Don't you worry your silly head about needing to learn anything about how to use technology, just give us your life-long dependence as we'll take care of everything. Also, AI.*

    Also, you will help save puppies and children and you are on the side of puppies and children, right? This is a great deal! You can stop reading here, just click the button to agree... for the puppies.

    *

    spoilerYou also grant to us full, exclusive, worldwide, in perpetuity, until the sun falls the rights to use your likeness, words, thoughts, essence, and produces in any manner that we, in our sole discretion, see fit and you also agree to submit to binding arbitration for any disputes

    In exchange, We will never give away your data. But we will ruthlessly exploit OUR licensed copy of your data to sell to anybody who can do a wire transfer.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    Boycott ring

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    fuckin'… they were expanding into dogs to distract from what the system was really for

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 12 points 6 months ago*

    Wait… what?!

    They mean to cats too, right?!?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    No shit Sherlock

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    Y’all just need to think about the shareholders.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    Oh, thank god, I was worried if there might not be a worldwide surveillance dragnet for in case I lost a pet iguana.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Fucking scumbags.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago
    [+] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
    [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    CREEE PEEEE!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Anyone remember "Police Blotter" reports in local papers? Some were funny.

    Someone called in with concerns about a neighborhood cat that is "continuously at large."

    But they mostly gave people a very dark view of the world outside. This led to metal bars on doors and windows, sale of pricey security systems, and folks walking around scared of their shadow. That all moved over to apps like NextDoor, Citizen, and Ring's Neighbors.

    Fear is a primal driver. People on those apps are constantly reporting "odd looking people" in their neighborhood. Not surprisingly, the pet "Search Party" feature goes through Neighbors. Those same users are primed to see bad people everywhere. They will happily accept any feature that promises "zero crime neighborhoods."

    ANY feature.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    I'm.... flabbergasted. Unbelievable. Who would've thought?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›