65
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by breakfastmtn@piefed.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world

Measuring America’s slide toward democratic erosion.

The crackdown on dissent and speech in Minnesota this winter follows a pattern that is common in countries that slide from democracy to autocracy: A leader enacts a legally dubious policy. Citizens protest that policy. The government responds with intimidation and force. When people are hurt, the government blames them and lies about what happened.

The New York Times editorial board published an index in October tracking 12 categories of democratic erosion, based on historical patterns and interviews with experts. Our index places the United States on a scale of 0 to 10 for each category. Zero represents the United States before President Trump began his second term — not perfect, surely, but one of the world’s healthiest democracies. Ten represents the condition in a true autocracy, such as China, Iran or Russia.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: Adding the metrics that aren't visible in the archived copy.

  • Stifling speech and dissent 4/10
  • Persecuting political opponents 5/10
  • Bypassing the legislature 4/10
  • Defying the courts 2/10
  • Declaring false emergencies 5/10
  • Using the military at home 2/10
  • Vilifying marginalized groups 6/10
  • Controlling information 2/10
  • Trying to take over universities 2/10
  • Creating a cult of personality 6/10
  • Using power for personal profit 7/10
  • Manipulating the law to stay in power 2/10
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] 0ops@piefed.zip 24 points 3 days ago

ICE ~~and~~ in Minnesota Have Pushed the U.S. Closer to Autocracy

Fucking trying to blame the victim

[-] breakfastmtn@piefed.ca 3 points 3 days ago

I think you might be letting ICE off the hook here though. It's not just their activity in Minnesota that's the problem. It's all of it, isn't it?

[-] 0ops@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago
[-] Insekticus@aussie.zone 13 points 3 days ago

Closer??? What a stupid headline. America is already there unless you're dumb, blind, and not paying attention.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I get where you're coming from, but this isn't actually helpful. The first step in solving a problem is accurately defining the problem.

America is not an autocracy - yet. And that distinction matters. America has a fascist administration that is working very hard to turn it into an autocracy. But they're not there yet. So why would you willingly award them a victory they haven't achieved?

The basics of winning any defensive battle are to make your enemy pay in blood for every inch of ground they gain. Don't cede that territory without a fight. If the defenders of democracy in America win this, it will be because they wore the Trump administration down, turned every single one of their little fascist power plays into a battle. And if you pay attention to what's really going on, you'll see that that's exactly what's happening. Trump's engine of autocracy is constantly sputtering and stalling out. That doesn't mean they're failing, but it means they can fail, if the pressure on them is kept up.

[-] adhd_traco@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

It kinda sucks that the sliders for their metrics didn't carry over on the archive version, since without it the article is pretty empty.

I also find the title rage inducing. Yeah, it's not exactly a surprise either. But still pretty fucked up when Minnesota showed (and continues to) something very powerful facing this shit, rather than just being part of the story. I'd argue their actions even hold weight against moving towards autocracy with in their little slider thingies.

[-] breakfastmtn@piefed.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks. Good catch! I'll add them to the post.

[-] adhd_traco@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Thank you! :)

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The nazi administration is the problem. Ice is just the gestapo

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

No mention of the demented rapist that did this, huh NYT? Yeah. Classic NYT.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
65 points (94.5% liked)

politics

28146 readers
2062 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS