Poland would be even angrier and somehow even more fascist if their territory was still property of a Russian monarchy.
post
got shot like a fuckin loser lmao
also i wonder what the Polish monarchists think about Russian revanchism? has it occurred to the empire perverts that some of their aspirational empires overlap?
"Evil guy goatee" I lost it
:hahaha:
Created the Duma
Only after the Russian Revolution of 1905, and he dissolved it
If you're a monarchist you'd think the Duma was bullshit anyways and justifiably deprived of any real power lmao.
owning a fancy car = you hate the poors
owning multiple mansions, palaces, generational fortune, having millions to even "donate" = lover of the poors
doubt Lenin actually had a car, probably just the vehicle they used to transport government officials lol.
edit: Look at this thing. Epic. https://unravellingtravel.com/lenins-rolls-royce-silver-ghost/
better google search result https://rttl.me/2019/05/13/the-comrade-of-ecstasy-lenins-rolls-royce/
That first link is infuriating.
He then began to enjoy the good life just like the Tsars as illustrated by this photo taken at the May Day Red Army Parade in Moscow 1918!
Dude was a well documented workaholic to the detriment of his own health because of his commitment to the Revolution, but yeah this one photo of him being driven in a May Day parade proves that he just wanted to take toys from rich people and live it up.
Two links to solid liberalism :LIB:
the Soviet government passed one of its first acts ever, with the decree of 3 May 1918 that expropriated about 2,500 cars from the bourgeois members of society.
To give an historical perspective, this predates the October Revolution by about six months
lol
They seem to think socialism is a poverty cult
They only think about socialism in bad faith so its not so much about their honest belief about what socialism is/should be, but that if they believe X they can strawman and slander socialist leaders like Lenin as hypocritical and grifters.
“Dynasty lasted over 300 years”
Oh word?
I wonder who ended it and under who? :thinkin-lenin:
fascists love to back the losers after they lose. resentment over losing is their main psychological motivation.
resentment over the expectation of loss, as depicted by lionized stories of noble loss.
fascists love to back the losers after they lose.
Hahaha. glances despondently at the rotting corpse of the USSR while shedding a single tear That's totally just a fascist thing.
yeah, this is also the world in which communism lost. and i think the lesson for the as-yet-unformed real movement is that we cannot unburn the ashes of the old world, only build the new one.
For what it's worth, I think the fetishism of dead communisms is more of a detriment than a benefit to today's left.
dae le sjws want le participation trophies :frothingfash: now let me tell you about le LOST CAUSE
donated millions to charity
The motherfucker was the Head of State, he could have ended the need for charity.
(like the Soviets did, for a time :ussr-cry: )
all people subbed to r/monarchism should be subjugated under my rule.
i promise i'll be a kind, just ruler.
now lick my shoes.
Tons of medals
I wonder who gave them to him?
Loses a war to Japan so badly that his own navy helps to organize a revolt on their return home.
Nearly won WWI, lol
Winning is when you get stuck fighting a war in two fronts, and you lose to fucking Austria-Hungary and the late Ottoman Empire
Winning is when you underestimate the Japanese because you are racist and get your shit kicked in.
also the brilliant plan of "the japanese destroyed our fleet lets send a fleet roughly the same size all the way around the world at great expense, oh shit they destroyed that one too"
military genius he aint
all 38 comments