26

A recent development in the VirtualBox source tree introduces an early but usable KVM backend for Linux hosts. According to a comment by contributor Alexander Eichner, the new backend is now in a workable state, or at least when running modern guest operating systems. Older or more unusual guests, such as DOS, have not yet been tested.

And if you’re wondering what benefits this brings, the main one is that having a KVM backend allows VirtualBox to continue running virtual machines even when its own kernel modules (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetflt, vboxnetflt) cannot be loaded.

This is especially relevant on modern Linux systems, where Secure Boot, kernel hardening, or distribution-specific policies can block third-party kernel drivers. In such cases, VirtualBox will now automatically fall back to using KVM if it is available on the host system.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] death_to_carrots@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

So, VirtualBox is just a frontend for KVM? Why even use it at all then and not just libvirt with virt-manager?

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Isn't VirtualBox an Oracle property now? Fuck VirtualBox.

[-] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 1 points 51 minutes ago

Came here to say that

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Had been for over a decade and a half. There's no reason to use that piece of garbage over virt-manager.

[-] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago

Came to ask whether someone uses this.

[-] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 1 points 4 hours ago

Even Window's Hyper-V is better than virtualbox

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
26 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

12006 readers
512 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS