354
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MCGiorgi@piefed.ca 60 points 4 days ago

The US is no longer a reliable partner. With everything they've done over the last year why should we trust them with this deal? That they won't change it or put restrictions, or exit tariffs on any of this? How do we know there won't be spyware in the jets operating system, or a kill switch, or an override routine?

Choose the vendor who is willing to work with us. Saab is willing to give us the source code for the jets operating system. They're willing to manufacture the jets in Canada.

The US will keep their operating system and be able to modify it with impunity. 'Did your plane fall out of the sky? Our bad. Our latest patch had a bug and we didn't find it until it was too late.'

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 days ago

They already have terrible reliability and need a constant stream of parts to keep them in the sky. The US doesn't even need a kill switch. They could just stop supplying parts.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

They were never a reliable partner.

NAFTA being a trade agreement that they can tariff but we can't should have been the end of it.

[-] ptu@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago

I’m amazed how the top minds didn’t see this threat after 2016

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

“This is not just a fictional fear. Donald Trump did this to Ukraine. He threatened to withhold, and did withhold, parts to the F-16 fighter jet radar and left the Ukrainian Air Force in a lurch,” he said.

Yup.

Trump is loosely adopting the subscription model. Agree to the new TOS or have services withheld. On top of F-35s being far too costly than the USAF had ever wanted, as a JSF it's a confusing jack-of-all trades; master of none, and so there's obviously much more sensible options elsewhere.

When the end goal here is national defence, one needs to consider how it will be ultimately impacted by entering into a "deal" with the current USA. It's entirely expected nations will browse on by and shop elsewhere

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 47 points 4 days ago
[-] perestroika@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Realistically speaking:

  • US fighters: stealthy, cost like hell, require good airfields and fancy maintenance (US assistance)
  • Swedish fighters: cheaper, not stealthy, but fire missiles that hit halfway across a state, land on straight roads, low maintenance

If the buyer is Canada and their threat model involves Trump wanting to attack them, it's a foregone conclusion. Get Gripen, equip with Meteor, get ready to kill some tasty AWACS.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 37 points 4 days ago

I will support any move that takes money out of the US economy.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 days ago

Most Canadians do as well.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

lol for real did the NDP write this headline?

[-] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Regular Canadians sure, but are the other parties saying it? Because if the cons want to keep the contract and the Liberals are quiet, the the NDP is indeed standing out.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Carney directed his finance minister to look into other options, specifically if they could be built in Canada. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f35-blair-trump-1.7484477

My other comment was more of a jab at the NDP trying to stay relevant.

[-] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That's good to hear, I hope they go through with it.

Regarding the NDP, saying the things that regular Canadians are saying, but in government, is kind of their job though.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

But… not the pilots and brass, apparently, they want the power platform promise that hasn’t been demonstrated yet.

[-] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Sure, but that means nothing at all if the enemy can just neuter your offense with the flip of a switch

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, obviously. So, are they in denial or do they know something we don't?

[-] tleb@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 days ago

I assume he's not committing to it either way until CUSMA is renegotiated. It's probably a bargaining chip. On principal I do agree that we should scrap the entire F-35 contract in favour of Gripens though.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

So do most of the Canadian citizens but, regardless of the national temperature, we're still heavily tied into the uber-complicated economic and cultural relationship we have with a superpower that is now a dying beast.

[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

If john deere can brick tractors that Russians stole I bet these jets could be grounded without a boubt

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago

It would be the prudent thing to do. Regardless of whether there is an actual killswitch, the logistics chain is too big an issue if the USA decides to follow through with being a fuckwit against Canada.

For the long term, I guess the question for Euro-NATO would be: "Do we make our own JSF program, or should we have a bunch of specialized aircraft?"

As an American that’s certainly what I’d do

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

I appreciate them saying this but NFP need to get their own house in order.

[-] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

In my country, the local air force would prefer the Gripen because it's cheaper to keep them flying.

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
354 points (100.0% liked)

World News

53602 readers
3154 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS