549
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 hour ago

There's nothing billionaire oligarchs fear more than people who are capable of thinking for themselves. Of course they want to destroy the humanities...

[-] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 minutes ago

I don't like where it's going, and I dislike Palantir, but I also strongly disagree with calling manual work "peasant" labour. There's nothing wrong with working with your hands.

[-] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 minutes ago

I studied poetry, painting, and music so that my sons could study mathematics and commerce, and their sons could work long hours on the assembly - without having ever studied anything - so that they can consume slop generated by AI that was pushed on everyone by people who studied commerce, created by people who studied mathematics, and trained on the works of those who studied poetry, painting, and music.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, they aspire to neo-feudalism, but that's a political rather than technology position.

[-] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

He is such a self-centered, megalomaniac cunt.

[-] enterpries@sh.itjust.works 1 points 51 minutes ago

Thievery is becoming a better profession by the day.

Beats working for fucking peanuts from the families buying our government.

[-] flock_of_nazguls@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

Well, I hope this douchebag enjoys his eventual prison labour. He's got the right attitude for it.

[-] elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 hours ago

we need more progressive taxing, ultra-rich people shouldn't exist, let them be rich, just not ultra-rich.

[-] Sektor@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

People are not hungry enough for any kind of radical change. Media and the narrative is controlled by the ultra rich. That's why for "regular" people socialism is a bad thing.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago

No billionaires until poverty is eradicated globally. And maybe not even then.

[-] enterpries@sh.itjust.works 2 points 50 minutes ago

Nobody should have more wealth or income than a doctor.

Seems fair.

[-] liking625@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

AI hioefully will be able to replace ultrarich CEOs soon too and cost us almost nothing.

[-] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 5 points 3 hours ago

Non-human, uncaring machines who amass and hoard wealth beyond human comprehension honestly doesn't sound any different than what we have now.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

The machines are less likely to traffic minors for the purpose of sexual exploitation.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 3 hours ago

They say all this while simultaneously whining like a bunch of little crybabies about declining fertility rates. What the fuck sort of reaction are they expecting?

[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Fucking manipulate idiot.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 4 hours ago

Thiels sock puppet is saying what the anti-christ wants him to say.

[-] boogiebored@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago

Humanities is literally exactly what ai is terrible at.

The tech folks might need to reskill and look out.

People will still be writing excellent poetry and we will need it more than ever. It will be spoken word and written and unreachable by the technical tendrils of these devils for training data.

People who think the humanities don’t matter are husks of human beings. Capitalist dogs with zero personality, no actual skill, and only insatiable greed. And apparently all pedophiles to boot.

These fucks lack humanity. They are AI agents with system prompt “mak munny”. Losers.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 3 hours ago

Techbros have no idea what the fuck humanities actually do apart from being something that girls who wouldn't fuck them in college studied.

[-] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 2 points 2 hours ago

I’ve been in software my whole life.

My two oldest daughters are pursuing performing arts and I’m backing them all the way.

And it’s not that software/STEM jobs will disappear completely but clearly there’ll be less of them.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
549 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

80478 readers
4927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS