Everything points to this - very clearly, in fact, even though millions of documents have been redacted or withheld entirely for the very same reason, which is also a flagrant violation of the law.

The question that has been asked here, however, is how anyone can be okay with this. You answer the question of why a criminal regime in a corrupt system that not only allows these crimes but makes them possible in the first place protects one of the perpetrators, one of their own depraved gang.

Your answer raises the same initial question: How can anyone accept that serious criminals, including numerous child molesters, have been getting away with the most heinous crimes with impunity for decades? How can anyone come to terms with the fact that their own law enforcement agencies are so corrupt that they do not fight organized crime, but are actually used to facilitate it? How can anyone be okay with that?

They've decided they are either protecting the offender or lying about being them.

Best to assume it's all of them until proven otherwise.

well yeah. the law protects but does not bind them. it does bind us, but without protecting us

If you are rich enough to be above the law, you no longer need to be careful.

It appears 9 times in the dataset by my count and it looks like it's redacted in all 9.

There is a 10th document where the search term "little naughty" appears, that the name of the sender appears. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00946722.pdf

I think there's a legal concept, that if you fail to provide information in the Discovery process, it must be assumed that said information is incriminating.

so this,

every redacted perpetrator is Trump, until proven otherwise

Then he's successfully protecting his owners.

Please point me to the mob sign-up sheet

They somehow failed to properly censor the nude photos of victims in the files (i.e they redacted them but fucked it up like with first set of files) but DID properly redact the email addresses of several key repeat visitors, one of them thought to be Benjamin Netanyahu.

they believe pedos have a sickness

No they don't. They believe they have every right to do what they did and still do. They're not being respectful from a dubious moral standpoint. They're fucking lying to protect themselves.

In this case there is no excuse to be saying that the victims are taking advantage of them. This is a system which is designed on abuse of women, teenagers, children and possibly even babies - A whole island designed for this, for rich oligarchs.

Also the story about illnesses doesn't hold up in the majority of cases as attraction to teenagers is excluded in DSM-5. Of course, there is also evidence of actual children taking part; but even so, it is a meticulously designed system where it was only them doing the abusing.

Also the redactions are done extremely poorly: Clear photos are being referenced of the victims without their informed consent - yet the abusers names are censored.

I'm sure a lot of other people implicated in the files would love for that to happen. Let's take down ALL of them.

That's what I do, I assume its either Donald or one of his cabinet members or close friends. Either way, he's a chomo or protecting chomos, and both are about the worst you can be.

That's actually a marketing tactic to promote their devices. Actually the scummiesy tactic ever because it takes no effort but caused a lot of anti consumerist practices since this was the first time consumers were pushed with enshittification.

Rich people unfortunately don't need to fear being prosecuted. They know very well that they are above the law.

Why would they? Laws are for peasants. If you're a rich rapist, they make you president

I mean none of them will face any real consequences from this because the American public are too lazy and stupid to make them, so why wouldn't they?

Plausible, given the distance between characters

💵💵💵

The font isn't monospaced, so it could work.