713
submitted 3 months ago by Gork@sopuli.xyz to c/Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] jontree255@lemmy.world 193 points 3 months ago

It’s because the sender is someone currently in our government or one of its billionaire owners.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Everything points to this - very clearly, in fact, even though millions of documents have been redacted or withheld entirely for the very same reason, which is also a flagrant violation of the law.

The question that has been asked here, however, is how anyone can be okay with this. You answer the question of why a criminal regime in a corrupt system that not only allows these crimes but makes them possible in the first place protects one of the perpetrators, one of their own depraved gang.

Your answer raises the same initial question: How can anyone accept that serious criminals, including numerous child molesters, have been getting away with the most heinous crimes with impunity for decades? How can anyone come to terms with the fact that their own law enforcement agencies are so corrupt that they do not fight organized crime, but are actually used to facilitate it? How can anyone be okay with that?

[-] 48954246@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

They've decided they are either protecting the offender or lying about being them.

Best to assume it's all of them until proven otherwise.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 139 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Me: "I need to use a zero-access encrypted email accessible through Tor so the google doesn't know I just bought a new dragon ball coffee cup"

The elites:

"from: irapechildren@gmail.com To: everybody Yooooo, raping little children is soooooo coooooool

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 57 points 3 months ago

well yeah. the law protects but does not bind them. it does bind us, but without protecting us

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

If you are rich enough to be above the law, you no longer need to be careful.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 105 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Whats (almost) funny is that most of these emails show up twice, from the sender and again from the receiver, but they always censored the sender so we might be able to find the other version with the name intact.

Also, they failed to censor the names of the victims, as illustrated in the newest CoffeeZilla video.

[-] inmatarian@lemmy.world 70 points 3 months ago

It appears 9 times in the dataset by my count and it looks like it's redacted in all 9.

There is a 10th document where the search term "little naughty" appears, that the name of the sender appears. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00946722.pdf

[-] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 95 points 3 months ago

Sultan Bin Sulayem for those that don't want to read another gross email.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Thanks, I need a shower.

[-] JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml 68 points 3 months ago

If it's redacted it's Trump. If they don't like that they can prove it

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I think there's a legal concept, that if you fail to provide information in the Discovery process, it must be assumed that said information is incriminating.

so this,

every redacted perpetrator is Trump, until proven otherwise

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] J92@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

It should be made known to the administration, that any time a redaction like this occurs, the public should and does imagine the sender to be Donald Trumpedo.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Then he's successfully protecting his owners.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The American people are going to have to become a mob to get any justice at all. It wont be good justice, or fair, or kind, or accurate, but it's sad that even as terrible as it would be, it's the only justice this system is capable of. Unfortunately, 30% of America is fine with raping children. Why should Americans even be allowed in other countries at all? Seems like they are a serious risk.

[-] GorillaCall@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

When they said they're redacting the files to protect the victims, its pedo talk, they believe the pedo's have a sickness and its the girls taking advantage of them, not the other way around.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

They somehow failed to properly censor the nude photos of victims in the files (i.e they redacted them but fucked it up like with first set of files) but DID properly redact the email addresses of several key repeat visitors, one of them thought to be Benjamin Netanyahu.

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago

~~they believe pedos have a sickness~~

No they don't. They believe they have every right to do what they did and still do. They're not being respectful from a dubious moral standpoint. They're fucking lying to protect themselves.

[-] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

In this case there is no excuse to be saying that the victims are taking advantage of them. This is a system which is designed on abuse of women, teenagers, children and possibly even babies - A whole island designed for this, for rich oligarchs.

Also the story about illnesses doesn't hold up in the majority of cases as attraction to teenagers is excluded in DSM-5. Of course, there is also evidence of actual children taking part; but even so, it is a meticulously designed system where it was only them doing the abusing.

Also the redactions are done extremely poorly: Clear photos are being referenced of the victims without their informed consent - yet the abusers names are censored.

[-] GorillaCall@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago
[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 19 points 3 months ago

wtf. in what world do you turn things around like that. Maybe having been groomed and all....? I don't know

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 56 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think from now we should assume any reducted name is Donald Trump

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I'm sure a lot of other people implicated in the files would love for that to happen. Let's take down ALL of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pleasejustdie@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's what I do, I assume its either Donald or one of his cabinet members or close friends. Either way, he's a chomo or protecting chomos, and both are about the worst you can be.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Michal@programming.dev 42 points 3 months ago

Funny how Apple won't allow movies to show villains using their products, but will happily add "sent from my iPhone" to pedo mail.

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's actually a marketing tactic to promote their devices. Actually the scummiesy tactic ever because it takes no effort but caused a lot of anti consumerist practices since this was the first time consumers were pushed with enshittification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago

Still trying to wrap my head around how at that time and in that context and when so many technology CEOs and celebrity/politically active people seem involved, they were all sending these plain text emails, didn't bother the least to try to make communication more secure and private

[-] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Rich people unfortunately don't need to fear being prosecuted. They know very well that they are above the law.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 18 points 3 months ago

Why would they? Laws are for peasants. If you're a rich rapist, they make you president

[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I mean none of them will face any real consequences from this because the American public are too lazy and stupid to make them, so why wouldn't they?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ep_Islander@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Funny how everyone made plans on what day to head to the island yet none of them ever went. None have been on the plane and none have been to the island? lol Then they all said he's a sick degenerate, they are disgusted, and they cut off all ties. They were sorry for their poor judgement and/or weren't aware of his past but they feel for the woman and children that were hurt on those occasions that they weren't there. lol They all said that.... they must have the same lawyer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] narp@feddit.org 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Plausible, given the distance between characters

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 27 points 3 months ago

There is one challenge here, emails are really easily spoofable. They should release all the header information of these emails, so that they could be verified. FBI probably have them, but they won't release those because they would show that Don is a pedo.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 3 months ago

The email etiquette of these people is appalling. It's not an IM chat client. Write proper emails you freaks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Probably from one of the 25 "protected persons" that were mentioned elsewhere. Whyever they are being "protected".

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

💵💵💵

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] morgenman@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I wonder if we could identify emails based on the width of the censorship block, or at least group them.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

The font isn't monospaced, so it could work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

The redacting is in order to protect the victims.. It seems like clear evidence on what side the government has taken

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 months ago

That would cause them to face legal consequences and that would make them a victim of the legal system and the WOKE cancel culture! And they can't reveal the identity of the victim!

/s

Kill me please.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

We always knew these people had no morals but seeing the way the super rich nonces type makes me want to take up arms.

[-] Darkness343@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Remember, the earth is just a resort for some humans while the rest are just the staff who should be grateful they were even given a place in it

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
713 points (99.6% liked)

The Trump-Epstein Filesâ„¢

1223 readers
1 users here now

We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.

Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post

Our Rules

(Subject to Change)

Our Justice System

This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS