693
EFTA00705860 🤮🤮🤮
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
693 points (99.6% liked)
The Epstein Files
590 readers
1734 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
If it's redacted it's Trump. If they don't like that they can prove it
Is anyone reading these emails who isn't already convinced Trump is a pedophile?
I think there's a legal concept, that if you fail to provide information in the Discovery process, it must be assumed that said information is incriminating.
so this,
every redacted perpetrator is Trump, until proven otherwise