It's nothing new, trust me. Lee Kuan Yew is mythologized in High Liberal spaces as the dictator that did everything right - though they often don't mention all the ways in which he had to guard his country against American corruption. He's now being mythologized in Alternative Internet Spaces as one of the Elder Statesmen of the new age, who foresaw and influenced the rise of China and the kind which just 'no longer exists in The West'.
Brainworms may apply depending on the viewer. A liberal might see a sober steward of capitalism, while ignoring all the state driven or anti market things that conditioned Singapore's successes. A reactionary might just succumb to Great Man Theory and worship the guy like a fetish symbol for no reason other than the ways Singapore was/is repressive, while ignoring the whole 'forced multiculturalism angle' that defines its relationship with the public. I'd say that if leftists were to take anything from Singapore and Lee Kuan Yew it would have to be in contrast with how China does things today. Singapore is a city state. That's by definition not a normal country.
