I'd support efforts to kill any kind of ads on public spaces, so, good for them.
64
So the headline lies. They didn't ban fossil fuel ads, they refused to put them on publicly owned property. That's a big difference. It's a positive step for sure, but the fact that public space is for rent be giant corporations is already a problem. Cities should be using that space to promote the city, it's people, and make it a better place to live. Not get scraps from giant corporations to let them use our own property against us.
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
64 points (100.0% liked)
World News
24284 readers
61 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS