479
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 86 points 2 years ago

Debian users waiting 4 years for an update:

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Debian: you guys are getting updates?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

Android-x86: you guys are still getting support?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Symbian: you guys still exist?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Me running debian-testing

😎

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I don't need to wait. Debian works great with unattended upgrades and I don't have to care. Debian will literally run for years without anyone logining for maintenance. It just goes.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I know but I am just impressed with Debian

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I've used Debian before, I personally see it as the greatest Linux distro (Arch is just better for my use case)

[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago

Gentoo users waiting 12 hours for the update to finish (Firefox is updating)

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I compiled Firefox from source on my laptop for shits and giggles one time. Poor i3-5005U took a good 24 hours to do it

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

What? 6 fck'n hours? That's so outdated I'd call it LTS!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

I'm flagging that AUR package and you can't stop me.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

Fedora users waiting 6 hours just for the update process

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ubuntu's updates keep up with Debian's snail-like stable version. In over 10 years using Ubuntu-based distros, I've seen very few app updates ... even between major updates.

Debian's unstable may have more updates, I'd guess. (I might actually try Debian 12 soon.)

And there's always the PPA route. I'm usually busy using current app versions, and so don't often understand that 'bleeding-edge' approach (esp. with all the memory and cores we've got.)

Gotta admit that Arch is what keeps the Arch Wiki a super resource!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I run arch and have VERY few problems. I have way more problems on my work ubuntu computer because I'm forced to add PPAs to get even remotely modern things like git versions that support this https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config/#Documentation/git-config.txt-pushdefault

I think it's totally inappropriate to be using a non-rolling release OS as a desktop. You're way more likely to run into issues when you massively update your system every 6 months - 3 years, rather than keeping things up to date constantly. It's not like anyone tests the upgrade process on a desktop. They just do it one day. Whereas it makes sense on a server to be more cautious about updates, where there's presumably staging environments, etc.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh yeah, I don't doubt Arch is solid, just different strokes for different folks. I got a bunch of stable apps I use all day every day to get stuff done, including some coding and keep up. Solid OS for my needs, no racing stripes, does what I need -every- day. I invest my limited OS time in maintenance/backups.

I recently began moving to Mint 21 from 3 NO-TROUBLES years in 19.3. Install from ISO in 20 minutes, copy my apps & configs over, done. Just as with 19.3. No doubt about smooth sailing. Point releases every few months, done in 5 min. Support 4 more years.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I just don't understand what problems you think you're saving yourself from. If the latest version of a package has a bug or just doesn't work for some reason, just install an older one. It takes 2 minutes, and you get to use software from this decade with modern features.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I didn't mention any problems I don't have. I just don't waste time on updates I don't need. I already have the older one, and it works just fine. (Now and then I hear of a new version that's better, and switch to it.)

Besides, we both know that sometimes updating Linux software does create problems ... which is proven by the existence of Arch Wiki ... and Debian stable ... or force us to relearn some 'improved' features (prime example: KDE's 'Kate' editor.) And don't get me started on Gnome.

Anyway ... so long as you're enjoying yourself with Arch, good for you.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ubuntu beta testers wait for 6 months. The rest of us wait for 2 years.

Beta testers, thank you for your service!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

I came home and ran sudo pacman -Syu. My system was already up to date.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I haven't even updated to the current LTS yet.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Me either everything is working just how I like it and I'll just leave it at that

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Yep, don't have the headspace right now to deal with any issues that pop up, and TBH Canonical's flavor of corporate-ness kind of takes the excitement out of getting updates, too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

6 hours? I get disappointed when I don't see another update within 6 minutes

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
479 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

25743 readers
1086 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS