6
submitted 3 months ago by Yezzey@lemmy.ca to c/AskCanada@lemmy.ca
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

We have enough uranium of our own, right? Even dirty bombs would be a deterrent. Please don't reply saying it's violating intl law, would be provacative, etc. that social contract was already ripped up, along with free trade and everything else by the US.

[-] bestagon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Lmao going to go ahead and pollute the world because of the shit the US is doing? The treaties aren’t just about your enemy’s humanity but also preventing unnecessary collateral damage

[-] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

I don't think there is any pollution unless you use em.

[-] iamunfuckwitable@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

It will stir up all the nations that signed the nonproliferation treaty. The downside far outweighs the up - Not a wise move now.

[-] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The only signatures of that treaty that would object is the US, China and Russia.

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
6 points (87.5% liked)

Ask Canada

110 readers
1 users here now

🇨🇦 Welcome to Ask Canada

A place to ask real questions about Canadian culture, politics, history, geography, daily life, and everything in between.

If you’re curious about how this country works or want a Canadian perspective, you’re in the right place.


🎤 What You Can Post

If you want Canadians to explain something ask it here.


🧭 Community Values

Discussion > Upvotes
We care about real conversation, not empty karma.

Respectful disagreement
Argue ideas, not people.

No partisan flamewars
Analysis, not tribalism.

Curiosity first
If someone asks a “basic” question, help them.


🛑 Not Allowed

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS