Developers making mods and plugins for hentai games and sex toys say Github recently unleashed a wave of suspensions and bans against their repositories, and the platform hasn’t explained why.

Developers I spoke to said the community estimated around 80 to 90 repositories containing the work of 40 to 50 people went down recently, with many becoming inaccessible around late November and early December. Many of the affected accounts are part of the modding community for games made by the now-defunct Japanese video game studio Illusion, which made popular games with varying degrees of erotic content. One of the accounts Github banned contained the work of more than 30 contributors in more than 40 repositories, according to members of the modding community that I spoke to.

Github didn’t tell most suspended users what terms they broke to earn a suspension or ban, and developers told me they have no idea why their accounts went down without notice. They said they thought they were within Github’s acceptable use guidelines; even though they make mods for hentai games and things like interactive vibrator plugins, they took care to not host anything explicit directly in their repositories.

Archive: http://archive.today/eNOI1

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 223 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If Github just kills repos without explanation, then using Github for anything is a mistake.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 120 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The moment Microsoft bought it people should have started coding somewhere else. It's just like everything Microsoft buys, it gets the Microsoft touch, survives for a bit, they make something to replace it and it's gone forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    This! Codeberg, Forjego, Gitea, or bust at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm OOTL. Why don't people recommend GitLab?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Problem is when looking for a job. 3/4 of what I have been applying for asks for a github link to your projects and won't accept something that doesn't match 'github.com'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Let me preface with the fact that I know nothing about Git or GitHub. Could you just have one "project" and have the readme be links to your Codeberg/Forgejo/GitTea projects?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The question however is: where should one move then? I'm genuinely asking since moving away from Github is something I've been meaning to do for a while now but didn't have the time to search for alternatives.

    The only one I know about is Codeberg, which could work for most but not all of my projects (for now at least). Anyone here knows other tried and tested platforms worth looking into? Preferably free as I'm not in a position to pay for this stuff at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    I've seen many FOSS projects use gitlab. You can even self-host it. Also, from https://sfconservancy.org/GiveUpGitHub/ linked in another comment:

    - Alternative Hosting Services:
    Codeberg
    SourceHut
    - Self-Host (or join a group that self-hosts). A few options:
    Forgejo
    GitLab Community Edition (note, the GitLab Enterprise Edition, which is provided to the public on gitlab.com, is (like GitHub) trade-secret, proprietary, vendor-lock-in software)
    SourceHut
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 7 months ago
    [–] 69 points 7 months ago (27 children)

    This smells suspiciously similar to the stuff affecting adult content on Steam, like Horses. No one's saying anything about any of it, which feels like that's on advice from their legal counsel.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I think they are testing the waters of just open warfare against indie developers. Microsoft has no interest in platforming their competitors. They start with the adult games because no one is going to defend them. Once the precedent is set, they go after everyone else. They do the same thing with porn as a vehicle to attack free speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 46 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    interactive vibrator plugins

    damn. what a time to be alive.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    For anyone that needs to know: it's criminally easy to set up git for multiple remotes, making a migration from GitHub a lot easier.

    Remember that origin is just the default, and you can have any number configured you want.

    • View all remotes: git remote -v
    • Add new remote: git remote add $name $url
    • Push to another remote: git push $remotename $branchname
    • Pull from a specific remote: git pull $remotename/$branchname (note the slash)
    • Fetch from all remotes: git fetch --all

    The first two are just one-time setup, and the rest just get bolted onto your existing workflow. At some point, you'll want to use git remote move names around, possibly even making origin something other than GitHub. Cheers.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    If only the forge parts were part of the spec like I believe in fossil for example. They are pretty much standardized already. All of the forges have issues, prs, releases. If there exists a git extension for this already, we really ought to spread that via word of mouth because at least I’m not aware of one. If not, I hope someone more familiar with the git spec could work one out and write helpful contribution guides to go with it. I, same as a lot of others I would believe, would be very much interested in helping build one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 28 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It's because they got bought out by Microsoft(currently microslop).

    I really don't think I need to expand on that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    So they waited 7 years to do the ban? You know that happened in 2018, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    There's a bit of merit to that. After a purchase, a lot of people are wary, and likely to magnify any changes that happen immediately. They need a period of stabilization to dissuade fears, and assure that "nothing will change in the long run". Even this article is highlighting what happened around a month ago over a period of time, because it wasn't apparent in the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    “Perhaps most frustratingly, all of the tickets, pull requests, past release builds and changelogs are gone, because those things are not part of Git (the version control system),” Sauceke told me. “So even if someone had the foresight to make mirrors before the ban (as I did), those mirrors would only keep up with the code changes, not these ‘extra’ things that are pretty much vital to our work.”

    What can be done about this?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 7 months ago

    GOTTA ASTROTURF THAT WEBSITE FOR ADVERTISERS BAYBEE. CANT WAIT FOR GITHUB POPUPS.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    Sounds like advertisments are coming and advertisers want the platform squeaky clean. Either that or some lunatic group harrassed Github.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    No shock Microsoft would do this.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    This is just TOS enforcement, they updated their TOS in October. From the article:

    Github updated its acceptable use policies in October 2025 to forbid “sexually themed or suggestive content that serves little or no purpose other than to solicit an erotic or shocking response, particularly where that content is amplified by its placement in profiles or other social contexts.” This include pornographic content and “graphic depictions of sexual acts including photographs, video, animation, drawings, computer-generated images, or text-based content,” according to the terms.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So they suspended users without telling them about the fairly recent TOS update? That's just scummy behaviour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Get off of github.

    Move towards selfhosting.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 7 months ago
    [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Bet the people that warn us about Islamification of the West are cheering this on. Same shit different toilet.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›