all 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 9 months ago

Left the nonexistent relationship with a cult icon to be with another human. Good for him.

  • source
  • [–] 71 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    This didn't have such a wholesome outcome for Cricket.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Is that from a british tv show? I remember something like that vaguely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 59 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 41 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    His prayers were answered, I suppose. Successful success.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    I'm just going to leave this here...

    0

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago

    He looks happy, good for him

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Probably happens more often than you think. What happens if you stop being a priest get married and a regular job? Well life moves on for you.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Just realized. That's probably why there are so many pedophiles in church. They simply are the ones staying there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    The church was a place where wealthy families could "hide away" male children who were problematic.
    They could literally pay for a position like being a bishop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    It's worth keeping in mind that "problematic" could mean surviving to adulthood along with one of your elder brothers. Either way, this meant that it was quite possible to have people who were not on board with celibacy being required to be celibate through no real choice of their own. Or not, which is far more messy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I am definitely missing the joke here. Can someone explain?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    It's the same bishop / priest / holy person in all 6 parts of the comic. This is showing the progression of a person following their desires.

    • At first, he doesn't look
    • Next, he side glances
    • Then, he's glancing a lot
    • Then, he's blatantly staring
    • After that, he's actually engaging
    • Finally, he has apparently succumbed to his desires and engaged enough to no longer wear his robes and have a kid.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    "The Sin" - Heinrich Lossow

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
    [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    the Slavic caption confused me because Eastern Christian priests are fully allowed to marry

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I feel like she knew exactly what she was doing, walking by him so often.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -29 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    Unrealistic: he'd be abusing the child.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Correlation does not equal causation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -25 points 9 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Oh come on, at least spell it correctly if you're gonna try and insult someone's intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not trying to insult their intelligence. I'm insulting it.

    Also, well done on finding an autocorrect mistake. Must be proud of yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Well, you utterly failed at doing so, didn't proofread your insult, and made a fool of yourself. Great job!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    *One letter removed by autocorrect in offhanded unserious comment*

    You must write the titles for those rightwing youtube videos about "Shapiro owns transtard in unbelievable response".

    ERMAGERD UTTER DESTRUCTION!!!!11!!!111!!1!!!11

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments