416

excited to see what this means for the project, the poor UI/UX of libreoffice is easily its most glaring flaw imo

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Agreed, if you grew using another program, switching is hard unless it's UX/UI is superb.

When I ditched Adobe, Inkscape was a breeze. GIMP is hard AF and Krita a bit easier but it doesn't have the features I need. I ended up using Photopea, and now I've tried Affinity and it's the best Photoshop alternative I've tried yet.

Collabora is looking pretty good so far. Still a few rough edges but easier than any other FOSS office software.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago

Inkscape is my favourite Linux program. And the UI got so much better the last few years.

[-] VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Inkscape was hell for me when I tried it years ago. I just had no clue where to find stuff and how to navigate properly. Maybe I have to give it another try.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] oeuf@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

GIMP is well worth getting used to, especially now we are post 3.0 with a proper non-destructive workflow for filters/effects. I had always found it confusing to learn, having the Photoshop UI fossilised into my neural pathways, but what unlocked it for me was following an online GIMP course for 2/3 hours, which amounted to far less time than I had formerly spent cracking photoshop or working to pay for it.

Some great plugins are coming out now too. The Batcher plugin in particular makes GIMP (and GMIC by extension) extremely powerful for automation.

Good times.

[-] ghost_towels@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I love Inkscape, it’s so intuitive! I didn’t even need to read the docs. And now that Affinity is coming to Linux I’m hoping I can switch my work to these options.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

now that Affinity is coming to Linux

Wait, what?

Edit: I've only found this and if this site were to be trusted, I would take it with a grain of salt. https://techcentral.co.za/affinity-for-linux-canvas-next-big-move-could-reshape-the-desktop-software-market/274861/

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think it's ok for switching to be hard if the UI is built for productivity. I'm not really a "creative" worker in the most common sense, so I'm guessing GIMP's UI sucks even after you learn it, but I do know VIM is not intuitive at all, yet improves productivity compared to most IDEs/text editors. I've also worked on an application, working closely with our somewhat technical users, and they would suggest UI changes that were often not intuitive, but increase their productivity a bit (less need for using a mouse, less keystrokes/clicks and stuff like that).

[-] oeuf@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

YMMV but I've found the GIMP UI to be pretty much on a par with photoshop after having learnt the UI and learnt/modified the keyboard shortcuts. Some things are in fact better in GIMP, like panning and zooming. I've transitioned to GIMP on my own hardware but still use photoshop at a workplace.

If photoshop was open source then I think there would be a conversation to be had but I wouldn't pay for it now that I'm used to GIMP.

[-] freeman@feddit.org 30 points 2 months ago

Yes, I feel bad recommending LibreOffice to people who only used paid software, as the UI is quite a hurdle. Installing a theme and symbol-pack was the first thing I did, even before editing or writing something...

[-] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

I honestly fail to see what's wrong with the UI? Sure, it's not pretty but it is functional as it is.

[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 months ago

it works, but it's far from ideal. a lot of features are tucked away behind unintuitive context menus, and on some systems you need to do a bit of configuration for it to look right. for example, it uses bitmap icons by default, so if you use a hidpi screen the icons will look atrocious until you figure out how to switch them to vector icons.

and an ugly UI is a problem by itself. it's uninviting, unwelcoming. it gives a feeling of jank, of amateurism, and not in a good way. if you open the app for the first time and immediately think "this looks like it was last updated in 2003", it's not a good thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Check out ONLYOFFICE for what a UI should look like.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

The insane amount of clutter. Compare LibreOffice to OnlyOffice

[-] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

They are comparable. Three bars with icons, normally you don't have that vertical window on the right.

It looks dated for sure, but it's not that cluttered.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org 23 points 2 months ago

software engineer, team lead, and manager at Red Hat for more than 20 years.

Please keep this man away from ui/ux. Nerds designing UI is how libre office got in this mess in the first place.

[-] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

He is not designing the UI, he will be implementing it.

The UI and UX will stay bad as it is, just on a modern technology stack.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nerds are the reason computers even exist. Maybe you need to leave the internet You muscle-brained jock. Go take your protein-shake.

More importantly who are your low-IQ monkey friends that gave you likes ?

[-] IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org 1 points 2 months ago

Ok? They can stick to building computers and people who actually use the computers can work on their usabilities. Nerds dont need ui they can use the terminal.

[-] hoppolito@mander.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

'Nerds should stick to building computers' but not the software computers are running is honestly one of the more harebrained takes I've read.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oeuf@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

Libreoffice is dope af.

[-] attero@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

FYI: You can use the new Collabora Desktop Version of LibreOffice with a streamlined interface if you want.

https://www.collaboraonline.com/blog/collabora-online-now-available-on-desktop/

[-] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean I got used to LO's default UI and make me hate ribbon ui that come with MS OF and Onlyoffice, so I hope they improve on the default ui instead of replacing it (if they replace it atleast keep the old ui as a toggle)

[-] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Why do people keep saying "UI/UX"?

UI is user interface.

UX is user experience.

One is to be developed (with code), and the other is to be designed (in Figma for instance). They have very little overlap!

[-] iglou@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago

Both are to be designed then developed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I just want LibreOffice not to be a sluggish bugfest on macOS

[-] presoak@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 months ago

Hey I just used libre writer today. It was a smooth experience. Surprisingly easy ui.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
416 points (99.3% liked)

Open Source

44793 readers
1097 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS