52
AI preprints : peer review :: Scott Aaronson : cops
hey hey hey!! there's always making it a Conference Proceeding
You'd think peer review would make things better here, but big ML conferences have to deal with an absurd amount of submissions these days. NeurIPS this year got over 21000. The system they use for reviews is that anyone who submits a paper is required to review a certain number of other papers. So yeah, your ML paper is getting reviewed by other people who happen to submit their own papers. Who are competing with you to get their own papers accepted. Yeah, no problems there.
and they're all using chatbots in their methodology and for the mandatory reviews
Not all, but more than half (at ICLR).
The power, of words:
Is all but naught, if not heard.
And a bot, cannot.@dgerard I hate everything.
@dgerard, oh nice quote-repost recursion. 👍🏻
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
2416 readers
76 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS