this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
489 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Bart is now available in Europe I have both options now and problem of choice :) People who have access to both for a while, what AI tool do you mostly use?

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT. I avoid Google as much as possible.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Haven't tried bard but use ChatGPT to write/debug scripts and SAP stuff. Also asking it when I have simple but technical questions.

I am also downloading and running the latest models in the local LLM space every 2-3 weeks, just waiting for the point at which they finally take over gpt3.5 at which point I'll probably not touch ChatGPT again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ditto. I mostly use it when Google (search, not Bard) fails me. I find it's really good at answering questions of the ilk: "I swear there's a function for this in the library I'm using, what's it called again?", or telling me that it doesn't actually exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I find Bing chat is really good when I know almost nothing about what I'm searching, or when I know a whole lot about what I'm searching. Like in your example, if I know exactly what I need but can't remember its name Bing will read all the spammy beginners' guides for me and get the answer. And on the opposite end, if I'm looking to buy a gift in a hobby I don't remotely understand Bing does a pretty good job of holding my hand through the search process.

Weirdly, medium knowledge questions seem to still do better as a basic Google search. If I need to fix an appliance I've fixed before, but it's been a long time so I really need a full walkthrough, the first few results on Google are faster than waiting for Bing to talk through it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having it do a search then summarize the content from the search in one step is really handy. Basically skips the step of regular search oping a bunch of the links looking for relevant info.

AND it provides the source / references so you can easily click and read the actual page the info came from.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google's built-in chatbot search "experiment" seems to do the same thing. It's kind of neat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not available in Canada apparently (bard version).. however bing is...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

... Is a sentance I never thought I would read in a million years

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tried both but honestly haven't found much of a proper use for either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still don't think it's much more of a novelty. From what I've used it really feels like you can see the training data in all of the answers, which obviously, but like if I ask it to write a cover letter it feels like it's some cover letter it trained on more than mine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It’s much better than novelty if you learn how to use it. I routinely use it to write scripts for Google apps scripts, bash, etc. I’m using it to help with rust libraries that don’t have much documentation. I’ve used it to research camera gear that I don’t know much about. And once you get some information from it you can then go Google. Google has gotten so bad lately that it’s not hard for ChatGPT to beat it though. If you’re using 3.5 I highly recommend stopping that nonsense though. There’s zero reason to use 3.5 and every reason to use 4.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT is my programming rubber ducky for general stuff

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find Phind.com quite useful as an IT person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have never heard about it. What are the benefits over generic chatGPT?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I tried both with same question and found them both good. I'm not actively using them for now, but if they give the same results I'll prioritize Bard. I hate Microsoft more than Google.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Github copilot (chatgpt) is amazing for accelerated programming

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I use ChatGPT and Bing Chat.

I barely use Bard because it does not support Spanish yet (my main language).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Neither because AI is bullshit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't tried Bard, but I've currently been using ChatGPT for writing cover letters for job applications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I still use Google for ~95% of my queries because I like real sources, comprehensive documentation, and not having to read a wall of text when a one-line answer would have sufficed.

ChatGPT is a good replacement for Quora/Stack Exchange for explaining general knowledge stuff like other languages' grammar and simple science, as well as finding authors/books/movies from descriptions when you've forgotten their names.

Bard is... kinda dumb. I gave it a few chances, but it was nothing compared to ChatGPT's free tier.