This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.
This community exists for the following reasons:
You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.
Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.
No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.
Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.
No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.
No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.
No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.
No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.
Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.
I saw a good article on c/upliftingnews about AI improving traffic signal controllers. It's good and all, I just can't help but think of the "look at what they need to have a fraction of our power" meme while reading it
Aren't bikes also required to stop at red lights?
Yes, but you don't need lights if there are only bikes. Lights are there to prevent heavy vehicles from colliding. If there are no heavy vehicles, then the lights aren't needed.
Also since bikes take up less space more can cross in the same time
So you're ok with getting hit by another bike (or several) when you go through an intersection.
Unless you live in a small town, if everyone used bikes, city centre intersections would be mostly mountains of crashed bikes and people trying to get out of that mess while more bikes continue to pile on.
All green on a large car intersection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIqCei97M74
Intersection designed for bikes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RQrKP9a0XE
People on bikes naturally avoid and communicate with each other non-verbally.
I live in the Netherlands. There are so many bikes there is traffic jams out of bikes, there are piles of bikes everywhere.
No, you don't need traffic lights for bikes, only if there are high speed heavy vehicles. I wouldn't even say it's just the heaviness, it's the heaviness coupled with speed that makes them necessary.
Ok, I need to experience this myself, but I'll take your word for it.
I was just thinking of the normal speed I cycle at when going to work, which is 25 - 30 km/h, and can't imagine that not causing issues on intersections if there were no red lights.
Of course the answer is to slow down at intersections :)
Yes, but depending on the locality they may only need to treat it as a stop sign (and can proceed if it’s clear) instead of waiting for a green.
Not always (which I'll mention in a moment) but:
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
Yeah I think scribbling out the 30% with a 100% and saying "roundabouts" would make for a pretty good punchline. I figured I'd get complaints about AI being quick and low cost compared to road construction, which is why I ended up going with the "bikes" punchline instead.
Roundabouts are great but it's expensive to convert a crossing to a roundabout, not to mention difficult since the traffic needs to be rerouted during construction. In the most congested areas it's almost impossible, which is ironically where it is needed the most
Additionally (I still love roundabouts) there can be a max-wait-time problem when there is heavy traffic in one direction.
If a basketball game ends there can be 20,000 cars bumper-to-bumper trying to leave. Let's say (looking at a map) they're going left-to-right through an intersection.
If there's 1 car trying to go top-to-bottom...
Game days on my campus can cause a 2 hour wait on a 1 mile road. My campus is unusual, but just FYI absolutely insane wait times do happen regularly in some cities.
Roundabouts aren't great for bikes. Huge blind spots for cars and drivers aren't clear on the rules.
I'm always extra careful on roundabouts cycling, people just don't notice you.
I think this is a US problem. In europe roundabouts seem much more popular - drivers are aware of the rules and bikes seem to go along fine.
However, roundabouts are only efficient if all connected roads are about equally frequently taken. If one main road and three small connectors are on the same roundabout, the small ones may end up being softlocked.
Alright, blocking this community. It's getting to be a bit of a pessimistic vacuum chamber, which is one of the reasons I was okay abandoning Reddit.
Good message overall. Good luck everyone
Sorry if it came across that way, I don't mean it pessimistically. The improvements the article talks about are great.
I just imagine asking random people "Is a 30% reduction in traffic exciting?" And they say "Yes--BUT only if you do it with AI and high-tech stuff Otherwise I couldn't care less".
Imagining that kind of response is hilarious to me.
What did you expect from a community called "fuck_cars"?
I mean I actually kinda agree with them. I don't like vacuum chambers and some of the stuff on here really does ignore the practicality of people's situations.
I'm on here for the good arguments and laughs, not getting in so deep that I think everyone can and should sell their car tomorrow.
I own a car and am resentful of the fact that they are pretty much mandatory in my country, but I don't think this community is overly pessimistic or a vacuum chamber.
That said, departure announcements like the one we are talking about here look like attempts to stir up drama rather than attempts at an actual conversation.
100% agree
It's not a vacuum chamber. All you gotta do is step outside in 99% the USA to get the other aide of the story, as we all do every day
Do you know what a vacuum chamber is?
Yes, and internet communities don't exist at 0 psi
In a vacuum chamber, no-one can hear your internet arguments...
(hey guys I think you meant echo chamber)
k
Bikes also have to stop at traffic lights.
Shh, you're not supposed to tell them that!
No one mention on how this AI would treat peatons or if they even know they exists at all. Stop measuring traffic by speed and throughput and start measuring safety.
Then roundabouts need to be used instead of red lights.
Absolutely. After moving from a roundabout-less country to Ireland, I wish every red light was replaced with one. The only drawback is that they're more complicated than red lights and many people don't know how to use them properly (or don't care).
Maybe we shpuld start training drivers more rigorously then.
I don't know where you live, but training and the test in Ireland are quite rigorous already. My son failed his first test because of a roundabout issue where anyone in their right mind would have done exactly the same as he did. But the rules are what they are and the test is strict.
And they take up a lot more space than traffic lights.
The trade off for improved traffic flow is worth it unless space is at a premium, which tends to be the case in high density cities.
True, they do take up more space. Not sure a normal intersection cannot be converted though, there's pretty small roundabouts here too.
Sao Paulo have a lot of them on the middle of some high density neighborhoods, they work great as traffic calm measures because you can't blast though a street because they are a roundabout on each intersection.
Improving traffic lights doesn't require AI, you just need sensors and some basic code to respond accordingly.
Most lights in the us run on a cycle without accounting for traffic at all. Most don't even take into account the time of day.
Car dependent design is bad. But the us can't even do car dependency well. You have to constantly wait at a light to leave the intersection clear for no one.
The solution is not AI the solution is having people responsible who care at least somewhat.
So I do reinforcement learning research at my university, and the coworker I sit next to everyday does traffic signal optimization using multi agent reinforcement learning and simulation. (E.g. his reseach is on stuff like this paper)
And we literally agree with you; sensors are THE problem for 90% of the inefficiency. Its rare to even know how many cars pass through in a day, or whether its 1 or 500 cars waiting at a light. However, Google knows (or can approximate), which is partially why they and they alone can get something like 30% improvement.
The other 10% inefficiemcy is coordination stuff though, which can be more difficult than you might think to fix.
outside the rush hours that is true.
in the rush hours it gets tricky because of effects like a light turning green, but traffic being jammed from a red light before. For these you need a network model and it is crazy complicated to adequately model and optimise even just a small street network.
So yeah, best solution is to reduce car traffic as a whole.
That’s why you take into account the traffic lights/intersections ahead as well. Works fine over here in NL.
what is ahead? for that you need to find out which are the main routes people take. But you also cant just give the dominant route alle the passage, because the other routes are important too. With that you get a complex network you need to optimise, where a central control uses the sensor input from the individual lights, but local contral is not sufficent.
And this is what the original comment stated, with his colleagues using reinforcement learning as one possible approach.
For a big road/street, whatever the main flow of traffic is following. So for a north-south street that’s busier than the east-west street intersecting with it, optimise the flow for traffic going north-south, including the intersections ahead. A “green wave” or “groene golf” in Dutch would work wonders. Stick to the advised speed on the digital signs and you get a wave of green lights for x amount of upcoming intersections. I’ve had them for up to 9 in a row. For the streets crossing the main road, you get some sensors, probably inductive loops to check if there are cars waiting. If there are, periodically give them green and turn the main road to red. If there are no cars on the main road (e.g., at night), you could have an extra induction loop ahead of the crossing so that the light turns green for the crossing road whenever someone approaches, before even having to stop at the light.
Sure, you could use reinforcement learning there. But you really don’t have to. Analyse the traffic for a while, and it’ll stay pretty much the same for a long, long time. Just optimise the cycles according to the time of day and day of the week and you should be good.