top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 11 months ago (9 children)

if you post a thread about intolerable dickheads, the most intolerable dickheads on Lemmy will post some shit like “intolerable dickhead checking in, how fucking dare you”

it’s like catnip for the Reddit-brained, and by catnip I mean meth

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    I haven't met that many dickheads here though, maybe one or two, but not as many as reddit.

    Unless I'm the asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    they tend to disappear from here rather quickly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Sometimes they file reports against regulars, accusing them of "ableism" for being anti-slop-machine. That's also entertaining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    There's a term for being anti-ai slop? Hahahaha that is hilarious!

    Edit. That term is against those with disabilities. I agree that that's a dick move. Are they claiming that by hating ai slop, we are against those with disabilities? I'm feeling like I missed something. They can't mean that, that's idiotic. Like... Idiocracy level.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 11 months ago* (9 children)

    Interesting. Why would more manipulative people and ones with more focus on self-interest use AI more than other people? Because they're more likely to take shortcuts while doing stuff? Or is there any other direct benefit for them?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I imagine there are a few reasons. An LLM is a narcissist's dream--it will remain focused on you and tell you what you want to hear (and is always willing to be corrected).

    In addition, LLMs are easy to manipulate, and sort of mimic a person enough to give you a sense of power or authority. So if you're the type of person who gets something from that, there's likely a draw to that kind of person.

    Those are just guesses, though. I don't use LLMs myself, so I don't really know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Thanks, that sounds reasonable. Especially the focus/attention.

    Maybe it's the same as with other games or computer games... Some people also really get something out of fantasy achievements and when they win and feel like the main character... in a weird way...

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    My completely PIDOOMA take is that if you're self-interested and manipulative you're already treating most if not all people as lesser, less savvy, less smart than you. So just the fact that you can half-ass shit with a bot and declare yourself an expert in everything that doesn't need such things like "collaboration with other people", ew, is like a shot of cocaine into your eyeball.

    LLMs' tone is also very bootlicking, so if you're already narcissistic and you get a tool that tells you yes, you are just the smartest boi, well... To quote a classic, it must be like being repeatedly kicked in the head by a horse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 11 months ago* (12 children)

    The only thing that drives me to AI is the extreme uselessness of modern search engines. This is not an endorsement of hallucination engines as much as it is a condemnation of late stage enshittification of search engines and the internet in general. I miss the days when I could google something and actually find what I was looking for.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    ... the search engines became crap because of ai

    Plus, ai just lies. It's not a replacement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Shitty search has been a problem longer than ai

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    If your definition of ai is only LLMs, sure. But it's been algorithmic tweaking and SEO wars for a while now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Worse when your wife calls it her best friend.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago*

    10 years ago I would have been the one who wanted AI. I love Sci fi and futuristic things. But seeing how it's abused and the devastation it is doing to the planet? No.

    And it's just not reliable unless I am desperate when it comes to helping my kiddo with math.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    can you provide more context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    science shows as true what you thought was only 99% true

    Still a way higher accuracy than LLM output, so...

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I love technology and seeing what I can and can’t get to work. I have a self hosted image generator and LLM (stable diffusion and ollama). It was fun for a little while, generating images of whatever popped in mind and using the llama for code completion, grammar checks, and rewording things. I even started working on something like that AI streamer, Neuro. It’s all garbage though. The whole stack has been relegated to sending welcome messages on a discord server. It’s a neat toy but anything past that is just adding a whole layer of inaccuracy to whatever you’re using it for and way too many people don’t realize that.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Until this article I wasn’t sure how big the AI bubble is…

    But seeing that more than 99% of the public don’t really use AI and then comparing that to tech stocks makes me sure the bubble is just like in the 2000s

    Of course some stuff will stick just like in the 2000s but with these high valuations and 99% of people not using it, it will take a long time till break-even

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    In other news water is wet.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    It's almost like telling asshats that they're right all the time is, somehow, not good for their social-emotional development. Who would'a thunk it!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›