295

submitted 4 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

science shows as true what you thought was only 99% true

time: 5 min 57 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago

Shitty search has been a problem longer than ai

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

If your definition of ai is only LLMs, sure. But it's been algorithmic tweaking and SEO wars for a while now.

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

Well yeah, llm garbage is the problem being discussed. Do you consider SEO to be ai? I don't see why you would.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

No, but the algorithms that search engines use to combat it is.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 4 months ago

ah minor correction, you're on Lemmy not on Mastodon, the venue for this sort of tedious and point-avoiding pedantry

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

No, they aren't.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

AI has been around since the 50s, Internet search has only been around since the 80s.

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

That is irrelevant. We are specifically talking about LLMs ruining Google searches, which is the last couple of years.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025

295 points (93.3% liked)

TechTakes

2463 readers

73 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS