So far Lemmy is vibing. Everyone here is excited and optimistic and willing to put up with a few rough spots to be part of something.

When the Eternal September comes, which it will, how does a Lemmy instance deal with bad actors?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 36 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

I think it's important to enable account portability across instances, like what Mastodon has. It should be easy for people to move to a different community, back up their data so they can re-substantiate their known persona if their instance goes poof, etc. This will help a lot with encouraging people into communities that suit them and with people who might stay in a community they are unhappy with because they don't want to start over.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I was thinking about this, actually. Wouldn't it be better to have users-only instances and content-only instances? That way you can have an instance with a policy towards certain subjects (e.g.: bigotry, racism, sex openness), but you chose the content you want. Just like if it were a cable or streaming service. You choose the content you want.

    BTW, is there a place to discuss this? How to improve Lemmy and next steps? Also as a way to know how to contribute.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 23 points 3 years ago

    Ban them. Honestly if it's egregious the admin staff takes care of it. If it's just some asshattery then the mods of the communities are left to deal with it.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 21 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Woah, this is the first time I've pressed "all" on lemmygrad. It's... so much bigger!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 12 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Lol yeah!. Default should be "all" imo. Also, the default sort would be "hot".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [โ€“] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [โ€“] 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (16 children)

    Some thoughts โ€”

    The original "Eternal September" (on Usenet) wasn't an influx of abusers. It was an influx of new users who didn't know how to do things properly yet.

    Most of the new users were from the America Online (AOL) private service, and known as "AOLers". (As it happens, I joined Usenet around the same time, but from a local dial-up Unix BBS in the Washington DC area.)

    The AOLers didn't know which aspects of the service as they saw it were due to the AOL custom client software, which were due to the AOL local server, which were due to the newsgroup (forum) they were looking at, and which were due to the global Usenet consensus. So when they had a problem, they didn't know where to address that problem. They complained on public newsgroups about UI issues with their local client, because they didn't know what was what.

    And the existing users didn't have the time or capacity to help them. The AOLers were added to Usenet en-masse without preparation. Nobody had signed up to help them. The AOLers were accustomed to AOL chat rooms that had staff helpers and moderators; most of Usenet did not have any โ€” just regularly-posted FAQ documents, which the AOLers did not know to look for, and grouchy users who angrily told them to read the goddamn FAQ before posting.

    Another consequence of the influx of new folks was that Usenet suddenly just had a lot more people. This made it a tasty target for commercial spammers and other abusers; which led to the eventual spampocalypse and a lot of people abandoning Usenet for web forums or other services.

    It wasn't long into Eternal September that the hardcore abusers showed up, though. That, I think, is the harder problem to deal with.

    "Good" Usenet servers did not reliably disconnect themselves from the servers that were accepting and forwarding spam. It was not generally acknowledged that a good server needs to block bad servers: the free-speech ideal was assumed to mean "accept anything from anyone; let the client decide what to filter out" โ€” which meant that new users who had not written any filters necessarily saw all the spam.

    And because nothing was secured by strong encryption, forgery was rampant; with a little cleverness, anyone could pretend to be anyone from any server.

    There were many, many efforts to fix the spam problem. Unfortunately, as things turned out, it wasn't enough. Eventually folks noticed that the NNTP facility offered by their ISPs was a great means for sharing pirated porn ....

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [โ€“] 13 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'm not worried about assholes. I'm more interested in being free. As long as the community mods are nice enough, I'm optimistic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [โ€“] 10 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    If a server admin turns out to be a giant asshole (present company excepted, of course), is there a way to migrate your identity to another instance?

    If a server admin gets hit by a bus and their instance goes away, do all the users just cease to exist?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 3 years ago

    Mastodon has that feature, but Lemmy has not added that feature yet. From a technical perspective, I don't think there's anything preventing it, the developers just need to code it. I'm sure they have their hands full dealing with the reddit explosion right now though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 6 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    My understanding, based on what I've seen with Mastodon, is that, yes, all users will just cease to exist if an instance admin decides to pull the plug. There was some stupid drama with a particular Mastodon admin for a really popular instance a while ago (I forget which server exactly), and they decided to just kill the server. Poof, 100k+ users gone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The potential for accounts to vanish if the instance they started on is, to me, the single biggest hurdle that Lemmy will face with casual users. I think that the devs need to really consider figuring out a way to make user logins global.

    I said this the other day, but I think it may, unironically, be one of the first times I've ever seen a genuine use for a blockchain, but I have no idea how to implement it.

    The reason that the big social media companies came to exist is precisely because people didn't like having to have a dozen accounts for all their different communities. Lemmy fixes that problem through federation, which is great, but introduces a new problem of "your account could just disappear, making all your contributions vanish." I know that was technically a problem before big social media companies appeared and everyone was using forums, but it's a big plus of the current social media giants- you don't have to worry too much about the company failing so completely that the website gets shut down, which is the only way you'd lose your account, any time soon. People are used to that stability, and will not be happy if they join an instance in the fediverse only to have the rug yanked out from under them.

    If we want this to be a true alternative to big social media, it needs that stability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Your contributions won't vanish, I can still see comments from people from dead servers on Mastodon because it's cached on my server. The bigger issue is when you set up a new username on a new server, how can you show that you're the old person. So ideally pick a server that has policies in place about offline notices, multiple admins, a funding plan, backups, policies about Nazis, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [โ€“] 5 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Why do people care about preserving their "identity" and posts so much? This was never a thing in the old internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 years ago

    Some of us have friends online and we'd like to be able to do things like continue conversations while still being identifiably the same individual.

    Also there's consideration of privilege schemes where the access is based on karma, activity, or account age. That's aside from the potential issues that could arise if someone with high privilege (supermod for example) has their identity vanish leaving a community minus whatever function they might have been performing (this user is allowed to send the bot commands, etc).

    On a personal note, not having to jump through a bunch of hoops intended to screen out bad actors just to access a community or group where you were already a member in good standing.

    Beyond that, there's some people who really want to express their particular identity or brand online - for example I sometimes write using a particular name. If I could no longer use that name and not even access my account to tell people that, it would not help my audience find me or my back catalogue.

    Beyond all those things, having access to my post history means I can look back at things - have you never sat and looked at old diaries or photos from when your were a child? Or been reminded of some event you enjoyed? Or even just wanted to check something went down like you remembered it?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [โ€“] 9 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I don't think mastodon has had this issue and it has been a while. Since we are not on Twitter, you can just block whoever is an asshole.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [โ€“] 9 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    When the Eternal September comes, which it will, how does a Lemmy instance deal with bad actors?

    i'll bully them away >:3 !!!

    On the real I feel like Lemmy/the wider linkagg fediverse will prob be good at self-moderating somewhat like other fediverse software's communities are. It'll probably be easier for admins to noice bad actors on their instance than it was for site admins on Reddit to notice bad actors there because the admins-to-users ratio on here will probably be better, even if things are kinda concentrated on lemmy.ml, lemmy.world and beehaw right now (people will probably spread out as they get a grip on how things work), and the average user will probably grow a stronger connection with their instance admins for that reason too, making it easier to address things like that since more people will be able to comfortably contact their admins directly. And if said bad actor is from another instance, and the admins of that instance refuse to deal with them, there's always community-level bans (I think anyways? I'm still not familiar with the comm mod tools) and, if more drastic measures are needed, defederation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    If you go to the bottom of a lemmy instance it has a list of linked and blocked instances

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    How long until we start seeing tiktok/instagram/facebook/reddit reposts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next โ€บ