top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 142 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So, is Saddam Hussein fetish acceptable or not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • Ah yes my knee fetish is much more refined than those barbarians with heel fetish. Suck it loosers.

    And by it I mean heheh let's just say my knee

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    hey let's not shit on foot fetishists too hard, I need them to keep paying me for femboy feet pics.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    By these standards, I'm a bona fide degenerate❤️

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Are people still hung up on foot fetishes? That's like the tip of the ice berg. I assumed making fun of foot fetishes would be the first step, but we seem to be running in place here. The cultural Zeitgeist never seemed to move on.

    I guess we will have a collective Fetish cinematic universe style discovery at some point where people realize you can have a fetish about anything. I never expected to super heroes to popular ever. Now I'm convinced everything will be popular eventually.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A lot of the public seem to have a strange and passionate hatred for feet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I think it's moreso that it's a common fetish while still being in the odd category due to the fact that feet by themselves are just not sexual to most people. Like there are weirder sexual things that are about as common if not more common but have an explicit sexual element to it. To use clothing as a comparison it'd be like someone getting excited by someone in best up work clothes vs someone getting excited by lingerie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • that feet by themselves are just not sexual to most people.

    That makes sense.

    To use clothing as a comparison it’d be like someone getting excited by someone in best up work clothes vs someone getting excited by lingerie.

    I'm in this example.blobcat, peek

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah to me if people didn't actually get off on feet I'd think it was a really clever absurd thing like someone having a back of ears fetish. But not only do people get off on feet, it's downright common.

    And like therein lies the thing. It's not only kinda weird that its as much of a thing as it is, it's also a fetish with way less baggage or room to be understood by those without it than other common fetishes. Like, pain is visceral whether you like it ir hate it. Different body types are possessed by folks all around us. But feet, feels like someone who's favorite part of the pizza is the crust.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    i would argue the back of the knee is especially unrespectable

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Just like last time I'm gonna chime in about how my ex with the foot fetish was actually super chill sexually speaking and while he had a loooooot of mental health problems his solid grasp on consent and just general sexual patience really made a big difference for me and how I negotiate my sexual needs with that of all the partners I've had since. He really really needed to get a job and move out of his parents house though. Still hasn't. Jesus that man was a dumpster fire in every other conceivable way.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You become even more respectable when the thigh is thicker

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Show me someone who gets going over calves specifically

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Possibly tmi, sorry in advance. Nice calves (and forearms) are absolutely my thing. I tend to look at both on men and only women’s calves, because I mainly look for a nice musculature/bulk. I have seen some lumberjanes who are exceptions, but that type of work creates a pretty extreme divergence from standard physiques.

    I used to do 15 hours of dance a week and now I walk everywhere and work on my feet, so my own calves are my favorite body part. My husband is a pretty big guy and he works as a butcher, so his forearms are huge- they look like Gaston’s from beauty and the beast and we call them his ham hocks.

    I wouldn’t say it’s a fetish, because I can definitely be attracted to someone without calves/forearms that appeal to me, but I find myself looking at them about as much as I look at faces and butts and more than anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Toes feels more mainstream than the rest of the foot tbh.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Those victorians where wild.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Idk, maybe it's me being more of a tit girl, but I've got more respect for the feet people than the shin people. Knee people are between them. But yeah thigh and calf are as normal as we are.

  • source
  • Some people like the part of the leg that goes to the ass. Others like the part that steps in the grass.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Doubt.

    I agree to the part of thigh, is loved by most... then I know some with foot fetish, that claims it is ok. But show me anyone but a priest with knee fetish. Ha

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    I really thought "least respectable" was going to be "Quentin Tarantino"

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As an asexual person: it's all fucked to me. Just enjoy whatever gets you going without shame (as long as there's consent and it's not something that potentially impacts living beings who can't consent like kids or animals ofc).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    i just leave this here for the refined crowd

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    No Posts.

    Wonder if nobody has subbed to it or one of my settings is hiding them, because I cannot believe that is accurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›