this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10186 readers
466 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

U.S. officials said the administration was required by law to spend money now that Congress set aside in 2019 under Trump, adding that attempts to push lawmakers to reappropriate the funding elsewhere failed.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-build-new-barriers-roads-texas-border-area-2023-10-05/

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

The Clean Air Act, Safe Drinking Water Act and Endangered Species Act were some of the federal laws waived by DHS to make way for construction that will use funds from a congressional appropriation in 2019 for border wall construction.

Fucking hell.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like he doesn't want to be reelected.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Still hoping to catch a few of those "build the wall"-idiots without realising that those are the ones most lost on rational arguments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryStarr County Judge Eloy Vera said it will start south of the Falcon Dam and go past Salineño, Texas.

There’s a lot of arroyos,” Eloy Vera, the county judge said, pointing out the creeks cutting through the ranchland and leading into the river.

Concern is shared with environmental advocates who say structures will run through public lands, habitats of endangered plants and species like the Ocelot, a spotted wild cat.

And it’s a horrific step backwards for the borderlands,” Laiken Jordahl, a southwest conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, said Wednesday afternoon.

The DHS decision on Wednesday contrasts the Biden administration’s posturing when a proclamation to end the construction on Jan. 20, 2021 stated, “building a massive wall that spans the entire southern border is not a serious policy solution.”

“After years of denying that a border wall and other physical barriers are effective, the DHS announcement represents a sea change in the administration’s thinking: A secure wall is an effective tool for maintaining control of our borders,” Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said in a statement.


Saved 73% of original text.