this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
76 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18917 readers
3584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm confused. Who is paying the fine to whom? Like is Washington state going to write itself a check, or does the money go to the fed, or what?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Good question, this is the state of Washington being sued by the federal government in a federal court, so I think there's basically no way Washington's writing it to itself, but behind that idk. It's possible all the fine money is going to get thrown into a fund that will be overseen by the court and used to improve these services (I want to say I read about something similar being done in a different federal lawsuit against a state for having crappy public schools), but I'm guessing, and there's a decent chance nobody knows since it seems like the court didn't want it to come to this,

The state entered into a settlement agreement in 2018 and agreed to address the wait times, but they’ve only grown longer, Pechman said.

Instead of providing more space in its psychiatric hospitals, the state closed wards, she said.

“The Court is unpersuaded that DSHS adequately planned for and took reasonable measures to address the bed shortage,” Pechman said. It continued to accrue fines as it missed its court-ordered marks. Those funds were held in abeyance, but Pechman now wants the state to pay $100 million of those fines.

[Bolding added]

In other words, if I'm reading that right, WA has already racked up over $100m in fines related to this case, but the judge had never made payment for any of them due on any particular date because she understood that fining a broke state agency for failing to spend money on helping people is kind of counter productive, but they've fucked around so much and hurt so many people at this point that she doesn't feel she has any other choice.