The typical pattern for leaders is to get "second opinions" from advisors who tell them whatever they want to hear, so... maybe asking the equivalent of a magic 8 ball is a marginal improvement?
post
replies:
I really don't get it. These things are brand new. How can anyone get so into these things so quickly. I don't take advice from people I barely know, much less ones that can be so easily and quickly reprogrammed.
replies:
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's weird for a head of state to consult their mentally challenged imaginary friend?
replies:
Let's be honest though the majority of politicians are so terrible at their job, that this might actually be one of the rare occurrences where AI actually improves the work. But it is very susceptible to unknown influences.
replies:
load more comments
(9 replies)
Meanwhile the American president uses no intelligence at all. Artificial or otherwise
“You have to be very careful,” Simone Fischer-Hübner, a computer science researcher at Karlstad University, told Aftonbladet, warning against using ChatGPT to work with sensitive information.
I mean, sending queries to a search engine or an LLM are about the same in terms of exposing one's queries.
If the guy were complaining about information from an LLM not being cited or something, then I think I could see where he was coming from more.
replies:
It's literally a cult.
load more comments
(1 reply)
Politicians and CEOs should be replaced with LLMs
replies:
It surely can't hurt, if it's to sanity check your highly paid advisors...
replies:
I’m not against the technology, I’m against people who runs it. I have problem with how they teach their LLMs on code, user data, music, books, webs all without author’s / user’s consent and worse even with authors / users explicit NO consent to scrape or to use it for learning. Another level is lack of security - ChatGPT chats available to everyone. Deep fakes everywhere, just see the latest Taylor Swift one. Sorry, but fuck you with all of this. There is lack of basic security, privacy and ignoring all of its danger. Only what that fucking AI firms want is easy, cheep and quick money. All that hype for nothing = means you cannot even rely on the output.
load more comments
(18 replies)
Some of y'all are crazy reactionary. There's absolutely nothing wrong with asking an ai chatbot for an additional opinion. The ai shouldn't be making the decisions, and the ai shouldn't be the only way you look for opinions, but there's nothing wrong with ai being ONE OF the opinions you consider
replies:
load more comments
(2 replies)
You can see it on this government policies
view more:
next ›
top 50 comments