426
Sweden prime minister under fire after admitting that he regularly consults AI tools for a second opinion (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

there absolutely is something wrong with sending the basis for decisions in matters of state to a foreign actor, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    As i wrote in another comment, you can run a local instance of chatgpt or other ai on your own computer, no internet involved

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    of course you can. why would a career politician who has very visibly been interested only in politics since his teens know how to do that?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Hah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn't a bad thing

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    i'd say it's still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Presumably it wasn't instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    it's still not fine, as per my first point. it's leaking information to foreign interests.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •