140
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago

Don’t preorder. That’s all I have to add.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

EA has created such a terrible reputation for itself. I like The Sims, but I learned long ago not to get any add-ons until after it's been out for a while and people have made reviews about them. There are some packs, like the High School Years pack, where persistent, unsolved bugs make key elements of the pack unplayable. That pack came out three years ago and still hasn't been fixed, and I'm not getting it until/unless those issues become resolved... which they probably never will be.

They still try to shove ads in your face multiple times on start up (and embedded a fucking shopping cart symbol to a menu that's visible during game play... which fucking pulses until you click on it.) Hey EA, if you want my money so bad, how about you fix your shit to make it worth my money? No amount of obnoxious ads will convince me to buy something unplayable.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Best thing to do with an EA game: Wait ~3 months after full release. It almost always gets discounted, it’s likely been patched probably twice, the gameservers have been patched, and the download servers aren’t mobbed.

Now you can actually enjoy the game without, “OmG iT’s UnPlaYaBlE!!1”

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Nr. 1 top seller on steam. These are the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

Too little too late EA. Go lay yourself down in the ditch where you laid all of my favorite gaming studios that you bought and murdered.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Agreed it's far to little too late. I've proudly avoided EA like the plague for a few years now and haven't missed out on anything worthwhile

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Don't care unless they drop the kernel level anti cheat

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I believe the rumour mill had this requiring the TPM secure boot.

This is what stopped a lot of users upgrading to windows 11 also.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I mean 2042 already requires Secure Boot sooo this is pretty much set in stone.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It does?

The free weekends never required it

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

They enabled it in one of the most recent updates. No idea why they would do that but they did.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

i don't know if you've ever seen professional competitive fps gamers, but their aim and hearing can be insane. they're almost equivalent to an aimbot. They can react in a hundred milliseconds and then lock on a head to such an extent that it really does look like a lock-on. When the enemy moves very fast they can still predict enemy movement based on their player character's animation, keeping the lock-on. Flying enemies are at their mercy as well, because they fly in a predictable arc. They can perfectly counter weapon recoil patterns because they've trained on them. I know there's the valve approach of banning cheaters based on suspicious behavior, but at an extremely high level it's almost impossible to separate cheaters from extremely good players, especially if the cheating gets more subtle. I really do dislike kernel anticheat and I use linux myself, but there are reasons for it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago
  1. Kernel level anti cheat doesn't stop this from happening. 2. Giving them this access is a violation of all of our privacy. It's completely unrestricted access to everything on your machine. 3. Devices exist and are becoming more popular, that sit outside of the users PC watching watching the gameplay and making adjustments on the fly to player input to counter things like recoil. 4. This makes this unplayable for Linux users and contributes to Microsofts forced update bullshit. If Microsoft cared about security they wouldn't allow this type of anti cheat. Plenty of BF games existed and functioned without this.

Kernel level anti cheat will not save you from cheaters. It only creates another vulnerability that opens us up to exploits and kills users privacy.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Even if you are okay with it, it doesn't work with linux.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i know, that's why i mentioned it. i don't mind losing out on games with kernel anticheat. if you really do want a big battlefield shooter, battlefield 4 is still an option. if you want something smaller then maybe you can try the finals, which also breaks free from the hero shooter genre a little. if you do want a hero shooter then marvel rivals also works on linux. i don't think you're missing out on a lot. maybe battle royale shooters? fortnite, pubg and cod warzone won't run on linux, but to some that's also a benefit.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Kernel level anticheat, so IDGAF.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Man, I ~~thought~~ bought unravel the other day for $5 on the steam sale. I didn't know it was going to a bitch to play on the steam deck. God damn. It's not playable on the deck because of the damn launcher. I need to switch to desktop mode to play it. It makes me sign in every single fucking and I'm getting sick of it. Fuck EA.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I have bf4 and steam takes care of the whole ea login, maybe it's your setting or something? That being said, EA killed all the other battlefield games on the deck with poorly thought out anti cheat, so ya, Fuck EA.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

They really did the Linux gamer dirty.

They were also dog shit but that's the last money they get from me until Linux is supported.

Going forward, no tux, no bux

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The only setting I changed is I enabled proton in compatibility. That's it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Sure, at launch ;)

Even then, online-only and/or no bots = no buy from me.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This was my first thought too. Evil corp can always alter the deal further.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I can't wait to enjoy this change in 4-5 years when I pick up Battlefield 6 for $1.50 on a Steam sale.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Can we stop calling computer programs Apps?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a race from Starcraft or WH40K 😂😂

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Why? It’s just short for application, which has been used to mean a computer program for decades.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

It's dumb. These aren't mobile devices.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

The term predates mobile devices by a long time. The only reason to limit the terms like this is for a non-techsavy audience which Lemmy isn't.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Thank god, if this upcoming beta isn't a technical mess, and actually fun, I didn't wanna buy it on their EA app.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
140 points (96.1% liked)

Steam

13593 readers
2 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS