18
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

I’ve rarely seen a source as sketchy as that…

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

This is literally the blog of some dude in Texas.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Guess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I mean, maybe? But in the meantime, don't cite them as primary sources, ok?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff

Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn't, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html)

I know which one I be using

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The one that confirms your previously held bias. Great way to choose news sources.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

OH NO, I have a bias

I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10477 readers
76 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS