85
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.zip
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] brot@feddit.org 63 points 6 months ago

Me: It's not doable for me to pay for all copyrighted input, so I'm totally pirating everything

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago

Ahh, so it's not a viable business model

[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

So they are saying piracy is the correct and moral thing?

Well fantastic, pirate everything! (as if you didn't already)

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 months ago

It's not doable for average people to pay for all copyrighted media.

Looks like piracy is fine everyone!

For once I agree with the tangerine mussolini: paying for all copyrighted stuff is not doable, hence I pirate all of it.

[-] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, it should be legal to not pay for copyrighted material

[-] Teal@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago

With all the price hikes because of pointless tariffs it’s not doable to pay taxes to the government.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

finally everyone's in agreement that what they're doing is illegal and should stop immediately. right?

[-] scintilla@beehaw.org 6 points 6 months ago

I just wish this lead to an actual reform of IP law instead of just benefiting the wealthy more.

[-] cadekat@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago

Agreed. This really isn't as simple as "training AI is/is not copyright infringement ".

It isn't like the technology is going away, and if big corporations with huge IP libraries are the only ones that have access... Well that isn't exactly a pleasant world.

That said, creators absolutely deserve to get compensated for their work, especially if an AI is regurgitating recognizable hunks of their art.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

"It's not doable"

On that we agree.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

So in theory one could start their own ai company fork an AI or even take some code and then pirate whatever you want and claim immunity for piracy because it is for your ai

[-] kewjo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

if we start a religion that believes existience is a simulation and we're AI could we argue these laws apply to us under religious rights?

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 6 months ago

It's also a dumb fucking argument in general.

LLM models are not magic. They don't store the entirety of human history in a 10-20GB file. That's a fucking stupid idea. They look at something, process some weights, and move on to the next thing.

It's like going on Google Image Search, and seeing all of the copyrighted images on your browser. You didn't "steal" those, just because it was downloaded. That's not how copyright works.

Please stop parroting this stupid fucking argument.

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Found the AI stan.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
85 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

6022 readers
280 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS