Strong doubt.
Those people “turning on him” aren’t going to start voting for better people. They still want to hurt the same people. They won’t force accountability for anything much less than all of the other crimes, corruption, etc
Strong doubt.
Those people “turning on him” aren’t going to start voting for better people. They still want to hurt the same people. They won’t force accountability for anything much less than all of the other crimes, corruption, etc
Sure, but their base being fractured is still a good thing. Who they vote for was never going to change, and so it's never what we should hope for. Instead, enjoy the optimism of the fact that their infighting will make it easier for left-wing candidates to enact change without being attacked quite as hard—they won't be paying attention to socialists so much (real or imaginary) when they're too busy hating each other.
Besides, who knows? Cracking the loyalty even a little might be enough for a few to start doing some critical thinking here and there.
I wish. I guess I’ve lost any hope though.
I still don’t think this “fracture” will change results. We certainly won’t get affordable healthcare, a safe environmental future, human rights, or power to the working class.
Disillusioning his base will likely hurt turn out of voters for all right wing candidates. I imagine he wants to siphon some away, but I doubt they’ll vote for him ether.
A lot of these people will just go back to not voting.
Fascism always tears itself apart, and it's important not to fall into the trap of 'picking a side' when schisms emerge. Let them tear each other to shreds, and burn the remains.
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.