all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 3 years ago (2 children)

The opposite of skeletons in your closet is no skeletons in your closet, not skeletons in the front yard. LOL

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I just realized that going up in flames and going down in flames are both very bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    "going sideways" is also bad. I guess the moral of that idiom is that directions are bad?

    I guess "going forwards intact" would be the good version.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    "going sideways" is also bad.

    “Going forward in flames” is what it should be. You’re in flames, but you’re not going up, down, or sideways (all bad), but just going forward knowing the flames will probably subside.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I can't figure out the bag of cats one

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I haven’t enjoyed any of Nathan Pyles content since I found out he is pro forced birth/anti choice.

    Fuck that guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    “Up shit creek with a paddle” - you’re in trouble, but you’ve got the means to get through it (tho it will stink)

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    The jig remains down.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Me trying to figure out how "towel" is the opposite of "phone", smh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago
    [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)

    Consistency?

    Edit: Funny though!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think it's continuity, like a spectrum. At one end is thin ice, the other is thick ice. etc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    Yeah, I think that's wrong. Since they are discrete and not a continuum. Since there are only two extremes.

    If his new relationships were true it would make the opposite idioms consistent with their non-opposite counterparts. Kind of the same concept as a contrapositive proposition, i.e. 'if A then B' implies 'if not A then not B'.

  • source
  • parent