44
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Rian Johnson says he scrapped 'Star Wars' trilogy was 'very conceptual' and 'never' had an 'outline or treatment or anything.'

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago

Whoever decided the sequels should pass between him and JJ truly ruined them. All these dudes wanting to make their Star Wars hit the big screen is why it came out a garbled mess.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Silence! We do not speak its name!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry, there were sequels? People have also told me there were 'prequels' but that's just silly.

Next you're going to tell me there was a Highlander II, or III, or ... god make it stop.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

The cash must flow

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Remember our agreement, Murdoch.

The boy is mine. And gladly there was only one Highlander.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah uhm just a collection of broken pieces and scraps of concepts to be glued together by bitter subversion, like all you had for that last jedi movie, right?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The Last Jedi is still the best of the new trilogy in my opinion.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think if you cut out the unnecessary side trip with the casino that it’s a decent movie, and yeah, probably the best of the three either way.

My issue with it beyond that was that Johnson and Abrams didn’t really try to keep their writing cohesive. TRoS was a hot mess because of that.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

That problem started with the first though. Not giving any clue what Rey's background was and then deciding that he didn't like Johnson's take on it was JJ Abrams' fault…

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Most of it is on Abrams’ shoulders, I agree. Johnson reportedly asked him if he was cool that his script was going to be a big departure, and Abrams gave him the green light.

Abrams famously cannot follow through with anything he sets up, so this isn’t a surprise to me, merely a disappoint that he was allowed to screw up the only sequel trilogy we’re ever going to get.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

It’s ok if it stays like that.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

AKA stop asking me about it

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, let's see, it def had:
- a clumsy, unwise, but loveable main char
- a comedy puppet & a rebellious cool char
- an evil apprentice with a color scheme
- a Palpatine
- ~~terrorist~~ guerrilla actions against the state
- a "star" (moon? spaceship?) of death with no survivors among the 100s of thousand crew, rip

/s (well, like 40% sarcasm, the 60% is prob just what would have happened by the end)

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
44 points (90.7% liked)

Star Wars

5658 readers
1 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

1. Keep it civil.

2. Keep it Star Wars related.

3. No memeposts. Memes are great and everybody loves them, but there is already [email protected] for those.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS