18
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The bigger issue I see is that it also results in less experienced coders creating code that might work, but that they don't understand.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

And in reality it doesn't work, or only works in very specific scenarios and thus fails with no one who wrote it around to understand why it might have failed.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Just like Stack Overflow then haha. It's usually either

"I copied this persons code exactly, why doesn't it work in my completely different codebase?"

or

"I copied this persons code exactly and it works in mine! I don't want to touch it in case I break it cause I don't get it"

haha

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Sorry but a study of 16 developers isn't a big enough sample to get any meaningful data, especially given the massive range of skills and levels of development.

I'm a developer and I use AI - not much, but when I think it can help based on the suggestions that it gives me since it's integrated into visual studio. It doesn't slow me down, it speeds me up. It could slow you down if you rely on it to do everything, but in that case you're just a bad or lazy developer.

AI is a tool to use. Like with all tools, there are right ways and wrong ways and inefficient ways and all other ways to use them. You can't say that they slow people down as a whole just because they slow some people down.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

It's a very small sample, so there may be biases. If the sample were larger and more generalized to programmers, there would be some support. For now, we only have more questions than answers in this study.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

If you already know what you're doing, AI generating code is redundant. If you don't know what you're doing, it might work for you, up to the point you're spending all your time debugging hallucinatory code.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

If you already know what you’re doing, AI generating code is redundant.

Nah, it can be really useful for people who do know what they're doing as it can be used to generate the "charlie work" (IASIP reference if you don't know) things like unit tests and documentation and things like that pretty damn well.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yup, yesterday I decided it was finally time to write unit/feature tests on a project that had gotten way to far aling with 0 tests. Just over an hour of babysitting Codex and now I've got 800 tests covering 16 models and 60+ endpoints (8000 lines of code) in the exact code style I wanted based on my AGENTS. Honestly, reading through the tests, I wouldn't know that I didn't write them!

Now, trying to use AI to solve a novel problem, or even a not so novel one with any logical complexity, and hours can easily be wasted trying to guide it, correct it's mistakes, and then eventually roll it all back and do it yourself because your smart enough, just being lazy! 😬

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
18 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

3503 readers
529 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS